Subscribe to Ichthys:[link: how to use RSS feeds]
***NEW: Bible Basics 6A: Peripateology: the Christian Walk – now available (7/18/18)
*NEW: MP3 Audio Files (New: "Select Emails")
special prayer requests
Does Luke mean here that he is writing a chronological history ("to write it out for you in consecutive order")?
it seemed good to me also, having had perfect understanding of all things from the very first, to write to you an orderly account, most excellent Theophilus,
Luke 1:3 NKJV
The word kathexes has been taken to mean that – but of course there is a chronological thread in all historical writing, and Luke is no different in following the story in this manner. More likely, given Luke's uses of the word elsewhere in his gospel and in Acts, the word means something like "next", in the sense of "the next one to do so" – which tells us that Luke was indeed not the first to write and that he knew it too (this also syncs with "to me also" in v.3).
Is there any lesson in the fact that it is Gabriel who is sent to Daniel to explain matters of eschatology and to Zechariah and Mary in connection with the birth of the Messiah?
And the angel answered and said to him, "I am Gabriel, who stands in the presence of God, and was sent to speak to you and bring you these glad tidings."
Luke 1:19 NKJV
Gabriel is an archangel, one of a college of seven, and these are entrusted with special missions (see the link https). Gabriel's particular expertise seems to be as the Lord's herald (which is the commonality in all of the specific mentions of him).
Did Mary think at all about what might happen to her if she suddenly got pregnant while engaged to Joseph?
Then Mary said, “Behold the maidservant of the Lord! Let it be to me according to your word.” And the angel departed from her.
Luke 1:38 NKJV
It is a mark of Mary's great faith that she didn't let such considerations bother her. Most of us, given a great task by the Lord, would immediately revert to human-viewpoint and consider all the potential hazards and problems. Even Moses and Gideon did so. Not Mary.
If Elizabeth was already six months gone by the time Mary came visiting and Mary stayed about three months with her, is it within reason to assume that she was there when John was born?
And Mary remained with her about three months, and returned to her house.
Luke 1:56 NKJV
It's certainly possible.
Verse 7. I ran into something you said about this to the effect that it was only the Lord Jesus Who suffered the humiliation here. Can you explain it again to me, sir?
And she brought forth her firstborn Son, and wrapped Him in swaddling cloths, and laid Him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn.
Luke 2:7 NKJV
The "manger" is a movable feeding trough which was used as a crib since they didn't have one at the inn. The notion of the whole family bedding down in a barn is not scriptural. The sign to the shepherds was the lowly crib used for the Savior of the world.
This is not saying that the two were high priests at the same time, right? Rather that everything happened during their two tenures.
while Annas and Caiaphas were high priests, the word of God came to John the son of Zacharias in the wilderness.
Luke 3:2 NKJV
Correct. And Annas retained some power when his son in law Caiaphas became the high priest. Our Lord's first "trial" was before Annas; then He was taken to Caiaphas.
Comparing Matthew 1:12, should we assume that different branches from the same lineage could name their children in much the same way? The genealogy in Luke is separates from the one in Matthew after David where Luke traces from Nathan while Matthew traced from Solomon. But the names are similar at some points including the one I just pointed out. These two Zerubbabels and the two Shealtiels are four different people therefore. But it wouldn't be unusual if the Jews of that time tended to name their children similar to each other. Luke appears to suggest that this was the case through the example of the naming of John in chapter 1. Do you agree, sir?
the son of Joannas, the son of Rhesa, the son of Zerubbabel, the son of Shealtiel, the son of Neri,
Luke 3:27 NKJV
Repeating names are not uncommon in any culture. In some cultures, children take the name of the grandfather (e.g., Erik Svenson's grandfather is Sven, and Erik's son will be Sven Erikson). Even names which seem to us unique and even bizarre may be more common – even in the Bible – than we would imagine without paying close attention to the many genealogies. The Greek name "Thucydides" seems odd to us – but it turns out that there were a lot of them (as many as 17 from the Classical and post-Classical periods) besides the famous historian.
I used to be confused about this and other accounts of this story. I wasn't sure if our Lord was tempted during the forty days while He fasted or after He finished fasting. The reason was that if He had finished fasting, it shouldn't be a temptation whether He should eat or not. But He was tempted throughout those forty days, wasn't He? The three temptations at the end of His fast were just the only ones recorded, not the only ones that He faced, weren't they? Or is this a language problem? As for being tempted to eat when the fast had ended, the issue was not really about whether He should eat then or not but whether He would follow Satan's lead when there appeared to be a legitimate reason to or whether He would not. Is this a correct way of appreciating this?
being tempted for forty days by the devil. And in those days He ate nothing, and afterward, when they had ended, He was hungry.
Luke 4:2 NKJV
Mark 1:13 and Luke 4:2 both say that our Lord was being tested/tempted by the devil throughout the forty days; all three accounts (Matthew included) present these three tests/trials as the last ones taking place when the forty days had been completed.
Verse 13 seems to me to confirm what you said in the Luke Questions PDF. The way that part is structured appears to suggest that the description of the temptations was to make a point rather than to necessarily trace history strictly. For one thing, it appears to imply that there were other temptations.
Now when the devil had ended every temptation, he departed from Him until an opportune time.
Luke 4:13 NKJV
This is a return from the wilderness where He was led by the Spirit to be tempted, isn't it, sir?
Then Jesus returned in the power of the Spirit to Galilee, and news of Him went out through all the surrounding region.
Luke 4:14 NKJV
Based on Matthew 4:12 and Mark 1:14 we know that our Lord's return to Galilee followed Him receiving news of John's imprisonment. This happened in the spring, but our Lord was baptized the prior fall, so there are approximately 180 days between these two events of which the time of testing in the wilderness is only 40. Mark 1:12 says that the Spirit led Him into the wilderness "immediately" upon Him being baptized and demarcated publically as the Messiah, and while that allows for a few days wherein He treats with the soon-to-be disciples (as John relates), it cannot have been too many. So it seems our Lord did not return to Galilee immediately after the conclusion of the forty days.
What was this? Was it the custom that any member of the congregation in a synagogue could stand up at will to read? How did it work exactly? Or was this somehow just a response to the Lord's authority?
So He came to Nazareth, where He had been brought up. And as His custom was, He went into the synagogue on the Sabbath day, and stood up to read.
Luke 4:16 NKJV
We know from Paul's experience in Acts that individuals "with something to say" were invited to do so at synagogue services on the Sabbath. Clearly, the congregation wanted to hear what the Lord had to say on this occasion (even if they were not happy with what they heard).
Regarding Luke 4:22-30. Is this a different time from the Matthew 13 story? Or was it the same story?
So all those in the synagogue, when they heard these things, were filled with wrath, and rose up and thrust Him out of the city; and they led Him to the brow of the hill on which their city was built, that they might throw Him down over the cliff. Then passing through the midst of them, He went His way.
Luke 4:28-30 NKJV
Matthew 13:54ff. seems to be a different occurrence.
Is this a prophecy of the event in Matthew 23? I thought it might be. But then their initial admiration of Him turned into an attempt at murder so that I wondered. It doesn't seem to me a prophecy about the Cross since the "physician, heal thyself" is prophesied to be thrown as a taunt at Him because of the miracles that He wouldn't be doing in Nazareth rather than because He would not be coming down from the Cross. Am I right about that, sir?
He said to them, “You will surely say this proverb to Me, ‘Physician, heal yourself! Whatever we have heard done in Capernaum, do also here in Your country.’ ”
Luke 4:23 NKJV
I would agree that the sentiment these people used to try to undermine our Lord in this passage is similar to the taunt thrown at Him on the cross. However, this proverb is not a biblical one but a common saying; in the context of Matthew 27:42 the taunt in the following verse is actually a quotation of scripture fulfilled by the crucifixion:
All those who see Me ridicule Me;
They shoot out the lip, they shake the head, saying,
“He trusted in the LORD, let Him rescue Him;
Let Him deliver Him, since He delights in Him!”
Psalm 22:7-8 NKJV
I thought that this part might mean that this is the same as the Matthew 13 story but #6 above is one reason I wasn't sure that it was. There is no reason that our Lord would not have said this twice to them, is there?
Then He said, "Assuredly, I say to you, no prophet is accepted in his own country."
Luke 4:24 NKJV
Our Lord no doubt said many things many times over the three plus years of His public ministry. Repetition is the key to teaching, and there are many instances where similar sentiments are repeated within the same gospel (making that principle clear). As John says at the end of his gospel, "And there are also many other things that Jesus did, which if they were written one by one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that would be written" (Jn.21:25 NKJV). The gospel writers were led by the Spirit to include just what we needed to hear and know – but this is only a small fraction of what our Lord said and did.
Why do the demons keep declaring the identity of our Lord? And why does our Lord continue to rebuke them and stop them from doing so any further? Was it because they were interfering with the free will choice of those who heard them to believe in the Lord or not? Is that even possible, that they could interfere with that free will choice just by declaring our Lord's identity?
Now in the synagogue there was a man who had a spirit of an unclean demon. And he cried out with a loud voice, saying, “Let us alone! What have we to do with You, Jesus of Nazareth? Did You come to destroy us? I know who You are—the Holy One of God!” But Jesus rebuked him, saying, “Be quiet, and come out of him!” And when the demon had thrown him in their midst, it came out of him and did not hurt him.
Luke 4:33-35 NKJV (cf. Lk.4:41)
The fact of this demonstrates His power and authority, so overwhelmingly that even His angelic adversaries have to "bow the knee" before Him (Is.45:23; Rom.14:11; Phil.2:10). The prohibition from our Lord is exactly along the lines of why He taught in parables, that is, so that those who were not willing to receive the truth might be able to reject it (whereas the demons could be in no doubt because of their greater powers of perception); free will, I would agree, is at the heart of the matter when it comes to truth being veiled to those who are not interested in receiving it.
I feel that there's a lesson in here for us. Do you think that it is a reasonable application of this verse for us to be wary of an elitist, separatist attitude that claims to derive from having Christ? That is, those who truly have Christ and know what He is about know that He is seeking to reconcile the whole world to God through us so that we don't become aloof or hermits. While we recognize a true distinction between Christ and the world and therefore between believers and unbelievers, we don't try to separate from the world and build our own little universe cut off from everyone else on account of the idea that we exclusively possess Christ for whatever reason. Is this a reasonable application?
Now when it was day, He departed and went into a deserted place. And the crowd sought Him and came to Him, and tried to keep Him from leaving them;
Luke 4:42 NKJV
I think that's a fine application. In terms of interpretation, beyond what is obvious in our Lord's very clear words, the individuals who wanted to keep Him there were likely not even believers – or not very positive ones if they were. They were benefitting from His blessing and healing and they wished that to continue – along the lines of the five thousand who get the free lunch and track Him down on the other side of the Sea of Galilee, but are really only interested in more free lunches in a kingdom they hope will come immediately – though they are unwilling to accept Him as He is or to understand what the first advent was all about (Jn.6:60-66).
Verse 16. For "to", the NASB has "in" in the footnote. Why is that? Is our Lord teaching the crowds in wildernesses and slipping away from them while there? Or is he slipping away from them wherever they are in order to go into the wildernesses to pray? Also, these wildernesses are also desert places as the NASB footnote says, right? And just to make sure, He chooses these places to pray in to avoid distractions, doesn't He?
So He Himself often withdrew into the wilderness and prayed.
Luke 5:16 NKJV
The Greek has "in", not "into", but the prepositional phrase can be taken either way. Our Lord made it a practice to remove Himself for privacy in prayer throughout His ministry, regardless of where He was ministering. A good lesson for us.
Our Lord appears to be reacting to the faith of the man's friends or does the "their" there refer to the friends of the man and the sick man himself? Is there some way to be sure? Is it possible that our Lord will forgive someone's sins because of another person's faith in their behalf? Is this the meaning of "[giving] life for him (that is, the person praying for the sinning brother) to those who commit sin not leading to death (that is, the sinning brother)" in 1 John 5:16?
When He saw their faith, He said to him, “Man, your sins are forgiven you.”
Luke 5:20 NKJV
I think our Lord knew better than we can imagine just exactly where the true faith resided. The man's friends may have had faith, but they would be unlikely to have the same measure of it, each and every one. The common factor is the man himself. His friends only go to these extremes because he is insisting (we deduce), and that insistence to do something that is never done is indicative of deep faith.
This passage is often used to justify what seems to me an unhealthy mixing up with the world where churches and professing believers make a point of associating with unbelievers even in questionable activities. For example, while I was still mixed up with the church scene, there was often the drive to use music that aped secular art and sometimes secular, unbelieving musicians themselves in church programs to "attract unbelievers to come and hear the gospel". It was often proclaimed as Christian witnessing and true humility to "hang out" with unbelievers. And I did plenty of that both in action and in vehement profession as well. But it doesn't mean that at all, does it? Matthew wanted to have the Lord in his home after he himself had embraced Him as his Master and of course anyone who has tasted the Lord wants everyone else to know about Him especially others just like us. So, this is hardly a situation of accommodating sin and rebellion but instead of joyfully and humbly celebrating the Lord Who did not leave him in his sin, isn't it?
And their scribes and the Pharisees complained against His disciples, saying, “Why do You eat and drink with tax collectors and sinners?” Jesus answered and said to them, “Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance.”
Luke 5:30-32 NKJV
I agree with you. For our Lord to attend a reception given by one of His disciples and to use the opportunity to further the truth is a far cry from desecrating a church which is supposed to be teaching the truth with all manner of pointless activities. This just goes to show that many people do what they want and then look to the Bible for some verse or other to justify their actions (it won't, but they were going to do what they wanted in any case).
Who are the "they" here? The Pharisees and their scribes of verse 30? If so, why do they speak of themselves in the third person here?
Then they said to Him, “Why do the disciples of John fast often and make prayers, and likewise those of the Pharisees, but Yours eat and drink?”
Luke 5:33 NKJV
This would be the other people at the banquet who were neither scribes nor Pharisees but who were equally offended by the truth.
Then they said to Him, “Why do the disciples of John fast often and make prayers, and likewise those of the Pharisees, but Yours eat and drink?” And He said to them, “Can you make the friends of the bridegroom fast while the bridegroom is with them? But the days will come when the bridegroom will be taken away from them; then they will fast in those days.” Then He spoke a parable to them: “No one puts a piece from a new garment on an old one; otherwise the new makes a tear, and also the piece that was taken out of the new does not match the old. And no one puts new wine into old wineskins; or else the new wine will burst the wineskins and be spilled, and the wineskins will be ruined. But new wine must be put into new wineskins, and both are preserved. And no one, having drunk old wine, immediately desires new; for he says, ‘The old is better.’
Luke 5:33-39 NKJV
I had a conversation about this passage and similar accounts of it in other gospels with a former teacher of mine some time ago. Could you look at it and tell me what you think, sir?
Here it is:
What do you think of Mark 2:21-22 in terms of our discussion about remaining in and continuing to attend church where the Truth of God's Word is neither not the focus or is very poorly treated? Consider also Luke 5:33-39, esp verse 39.
Please may i know how these scriptures relate to that discussion?
I was thinking in terms of the fact that when a believer commits to God's Truth, that is like taking new wine and church groups can be like old wineskins. In the event that the believer tries to put this new thing of such potency into this old thing, there is a chance that instead of saving it, he will destroy it and the Truth will still be wasted just like the new wine is lost when the old wineskins bursts. What do you think, sir?
That saying means that God does not put His life in an old life.
That seems strange to me in light of the Luke passage. Clearly, Nicodemus could receive God's life in his heart even though he was a Pharisee but Jesus's response here was made to the Pharisees and to John's disciples who were upholding old traditions when the new was right there to be had.
The old life (sin) must be dealt with before the new life is put in one. Nicodemus' natural life was dealt with before the new life was put in him. The passages are to the effect that old life and new life cannot coexist
Oh. I understand what you said now. But it seems to me that the same works for institutions like denominations. While they still cling to their errors, it is really not possible to "change them from within", is it?
I don't want to apply it to denominations, as that will be out of context!
Can you explain that further for me, sir? My reservation is that John's disciples and the Pharisees were very like today's denominations in so far as they were clearly defined institutions that possessed and held on to traditions and doctrines that gave no place to the Truth.
Jesus was speaking to the scribes and Pharisees only. He was speaking to the nature they carry, which is SIN. Denominations of today have born again Christians unlike the Pharisees, so it can't apply.
Yes, sir, it was the Scribes and Pharisees who asked the question. I was referring to the practice of John's disciples as well since in another place (Matthew 9:14), they themselves also ask the question and get the same answer from our Lord. I think that the two groups (Pharisees et al and today's denominations) are very similar in that respect. I mentioned Nicodemus who remained a secret disciple of Jesus until His Death at which time he came out with it. Two of our Lord's first disciples also, one of whom was Andrew who later became an apostle, also came to our Lord from among John's disciples. That might mean that there were some among them who also truly believed in our Lord but who still identified with John for whatever reason. That is what we see in today's denominations as well. So, the two situations appear very similar to me. END
I would be very happy to learn where I was wrong or could have been more right if possible, sir.
You are right on the money. Your interpretation is correct. The other person's application is a loose one and capable of great misinterpretation, but it is not in any case the correct interpretation. Jesus is clearly comparing the legalistic and ineffective teaching of the scribes and Pharisees in their synagogues to the powerful new teaching of the truth by Himself (and later by those who belong to Him) – and that is why He did not, after the inauguration of His ministry, go into the synagogues to teach. Likewise, while Paul began there often, he always ended up moving to other venues.
What is the lesson in our Lord's words here? And did David actually break the Law by eating that bread and giving it to his companions?
And some of the Pharisees said to them, “Why are you doing what is not lawful to do on the Sabbath?” But Jesus answering them said, “Have you not even read this, what David did when he was hungry, he and those who were with him: how he went into the house of God, took and ate the showbread, and also gave some to those with him, which is not lawful for any but the priests to eat?” And He said to them, “The Son of Man is also Lord of the Sabbath.”
Luke 6:2-5 NKJV
The lesson is that the Lord made the Sabbath for the benefit of His people; it is not meant to be a means of oppressing or disadvantaging His people – and it is certainly no means for finding fault with Him who is the Lord of the Sabbath. As our Lord points out repeatedly, necessary things can overrule the Sabbath rest requirements. I dare say that if your spouse were ill and needed immediate medical attention the fact that the doctor was more than a Sabbath's journey away should not dissuade you from fetching him. David was on the run for his life and the bread no doubt saved his life and the lives of the men fleeing with him. I guarantee you that Saul would not have stopped the pursuit because it was the Sabbath. People often use religious scruples as excuses for not doing the right or necessary thing because they don't want to, or for finding fault with others. This is evil hypocrisy and our Lord is calling it out here.
Jesus telling us to "turn the other cheek" in Luke 6:27-36, this passage is teaching us to bear humiliation and inconvenience without fighting back or attempting to hurt other people even if they are the immediate cause of our humiliation and discomfort. I believe you distinguished this from how we ought to react to threats to life and one's loved ones and crimes perpetrated against us. Have I got this right, sir?
Yes, and nicely put! There is no serious threat to life and limb in the situations the Lord describes. Self-defense is something entirely different as is legitimate use of deadly force by constituted authority. After all, our Lord will personally slaughter the armies of antichrist at Armageddon and thus save Israel (compare the typical parallel of the Red Sea: Ex.14-15).
In Luke 6:39-49, am I right to think that our Lord was teaching multiple lessons here rather than addressing Himself to one subject matter?
I'm not willing to say that there is no continuity whatsoever to long passages in the gospels where there is no indication that our Lord stopped speaking; but it is also true that there are many instances where it is incontrovertible that He introduces topics that are "new enough" that we will make a mistake of interpretation by overly belaboring the connection.
Why does Luke omit what Jesus does to make the miracle happen? Was it to focus on the man's unusual faith?
And a certain centurion’s servant, who was dear to him, was sick and ready to die. So when he heard about Jesus, he sent elders of the Jews to Him, pleading with Him to come and heal his servant. And when they came to Jesus, they begged Him earnestly, saying that the one for whom He should do this was deserving, for he loves our nation, and has built us a synagogue.” Then Jesus went with them. And when He was already not far from the house, the centurion sent friends to Him, saying to Him, “Lord, do not trouble Yourself, for I am not worthy that You should enter under my roof. Therefore I did not even think myself worthy to come to You. But say the word, and my servant will be healed. For I also am a man placed under authority, having soldiers under me. And I say to one, ‘Go,’ and he goes; and to another, ‘Come,’ and he comes; and to my servant, ‘Do this,’ and he does it.” When Jesus heard these things, He marveled at him, and turned around and said to the crowd that followed Him, “I say to you, I have not found such great faith, not even in Israel!” And those who were sent, returning to the house, found the servant well who had been sick.
Luke 7:2-10 NKJV
The point about drawing attention to the man's unusually strong faith is a good one. Jesus did not need to "do" anything but merely proclaim it for it to happen (not that this did not entail effort on His part in His humanity). Often He does "do" a variety of things for healing et al., because of a lack of similar faith or to make a specific point such as the legitimacy of doing the Will of God on the Sabbath (touch healing assigns the source to Him), and also for Him to have to "work" for the Will of God to be done (cf. Ex.17:11-12).
Was it usual that a crowd would follow a bereaved person like that? Or was this a special circumstance?
And when He came near the gate of the city, behold, a dead man was being carried out, the only son of his mother; and she was a widow. And a large crowd from the city was with her.
Luke 7:12 NKJV
As with funerals today, my impression is that such a genuine outpouring of support was a sign of the grace the individual and / or his mother had in the eyes of the townspeople (cf. Prov.10:11).
Why did they stop?
Then He came and touched the open coffin, and those who carried him stood still. And He said, “Young man, I say to you, arise.”
Luke 7:12 NKJV
I imagine for the same reason that a crowd would stop today if it bumped into a person of immense authority and standing, namely, to see what he would have to say.
It seems to me that by the time our Lord raised Lazarus He had raised at least this widow's son from the dead but it was still hard for His disciples to believe that He could raise Lazarus. To be fair, I am not certain that Mary, Martha and Lazarus had even learned about Him by this time. But His apostles were there. Their later reaction at the time of the Lazarus miracle seems a little like they had forgotten about this one (although the particular stated concern there seemed to be for the Lord's safety from the Jews). But as you said before, we are often very weak just as they were then and very soon after a miracle we may forget that God is powerful enough and knowing enough to rescue us out of all difficulty.
It's a good point that the disciples ought to have been much more spiritually advanced than they were, given their proximity to the Lord for so long (Mary and Martha, however, were among the greatest believers of their generation: cf., Matt.26:13; Jn.11:21-27).
What does our Lord mean here? I'm not sure I haven't asked this question or read an answer from any of the Q & A PDFs because it has bothered me for a long time but I don't remember any answer from you about it. From everything I've learned from you, I am confident that OT believers were very much a part of the Church. But why does our Lord say that the least in the kingdom is greater than John Whom our Lord declared to be the greatest of all prophets ever born. I don't understand at all.
“For I say to you, among those born of women there is not a greater prophet than John the Baptist; but he who is least in the kingdom of God is greater than he.”
Luke 7:28 NKJV
Basic meaning: better the last in line at the resurrection than tops in the Church and still in the world (see the link).
Is Nain in or around Bethany? The scene shifts rather seamlessly from raising the widow's son from the dead to John the Baptist's query to being in Simon's house. That's why I wonder.
Then one of the Pharisees asked Him to eat with him. And He went to the Pharisee’s house, and sat down to eat. And behold, a woman in the city who was a sinner, when she knew that Jesus sat at the table in the Pharisee’s house, brought an alabaster flask of fragrant oil, and stood at His feet behind Him weeping; and she began to wash His feet with her tears, and wiped them with the hair of her head; and she kissed His feet and anointed them with the fragrant oil.
Luke 7:36-39 NKJV
As with many geographic references in scripture, no one knows for certain. Some have identified it with a place in the north fairly close to Mt. Tabor. If so, that is a long way from Bethany which was within relatively easy walking distance of Jerusalem.
It appears that the Lord turns things inside out. First He says that Mary is forgiven all her many sins "for she loved much" then He says, "he who is forgiven little loves little". He is speaking to Simon about the human perception of sin, isn't He? Because who can say truthfully that they have only so little to be forgiven? And I think that our love for God is taught in the Bible to be a response to His magnanimity in forgiving us. So, there is more in what our Lord was saying than that because Mary loved so much, she was forgiven so much? Am I right about this, sir?
“Therefore I say to you, her sins, which are many, are forgiven, for she loved much. But to whom little is forgiven, the same loves little.”
Luke 7:47 NKJV
I think our Lord says that it's the other way around. He forgives us all everything, after all, having died for all of our sins. But a person who feels that he/she needs very little forgiveness will be naturally less grateful than a person who fully realizes just how much that forgiveness was needful. The irony, of course, is that if a person committed just one sin of the tiniest moment, without the cross there could be no eternal life but only damnation. So regardless of how WE view ourselves and how good or bad we think we've been, every Christian (and every human being) ought to recognize the magnitude of the cross and that we owe our Lord more than we could ever properly imagine.
This is probably the clearest rendering of this part of the parable. It seems obvious from here that the issue is that the Word result in a mature faith that bears fruit. And I read the cross-references again and they were abundantly clear as well to me now. The issue in all of them is fruitfulness not a complete failure of faith. The faith just does not mature enough to be fruitful but it does remain. I am happy to be able to see it this clearly now.
"Now the ones that fell among thorns are those who, when they have heard, go out and are choked with cares, riches, and pleasures of life, and bring no fruit to maturity."
Luke 8:14 NKJV
Good! Covered in Peter #12.
It seems that bearing fruit is very closely associated with "perseverance" or "steadfastness".
"But the ones that fell on the good ground are those who, having heard the word with a noble and good heart, keep it and bear fruit with patience."
Luke 8:15 NKJV
Yes, hypomone, "perseverance" ("patience" in the translation above), is an important Christian virtue:
I, John, your brother and companion in the suffering and kingdom and patient endurance (hypomone) that are ours in Jesus . . .
Revelation 1:9 NIV
We have tribulation in the world as we look forward to the kingdom, and "patient endurance" (hypomone) is what keeps us holding on to the hope of what is to come in the face of the waves of trouble and darkness here in devil's world (cf. e.g., Rom.2:7; 5:3-4; 8:25; Heb.12:1; 2Pet.1:6).
Is there a connection between this bit and what our Lord was saying just before? Verse 18 makes me think that there is. If there is, what exactly is it? And what does verse 18 mean?
"No one, when he has lit a lamp, covers it with a vessel or puts it under a bed, but sets it on a lampstand, that those who enter may see the light. For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and come to light. Therefore take heed how you hear. For whoever has, to him more will be given; and whoever does not have, even what he seems to have will be taken from him."
Luke 8:16-18 NKJV
In my experience, this is generally not a fruitful path of interpretation. Our Lord's teaching is a perfect, complete whole, but it is split up into four gospels (which of course only provide limited details chosen by the Spirit: Jn.21:25). That is not to say that the order is not also inspired or that there is no reason for it; clearly there must be. But when a new parable or a new subject follows, trying to say that there is therefore an interpretative twist to be placed on the next or the prior element of teaching – unless that is obvious and clearly intentional – usually not only results in spinning one's wheels but can very often produce more harm than good when trying to find "the reason for the connection" is forced.
Is the Lord back in Capernaum or Nazareth at this point? Or did His family come looking for Him wherever He was here?
Then His mother and brothers came to Him, and could not approach Him because of the crowd. And it was told Him by some, who said, “Your mother and Your brothers are standing outside, desiring to see You.” But He answered and said to them, “My mother and My brothers are these who hear the word of God and do it.”
Luke 8:19-21 NKJV
Text doesn't say, however, this passage seems to be directly parallel to Matthew 12:46-50 and Mark 3:31-35; Mark seems to place this event following the ordaining of the twelve (Mk.3:14ff.). According to Thomas and Gundry, this would have been in Galilee, but I'm not sure we can say definitively.
How was our Lord able to speak to a crowd of 5 000 at that time and have them all able to hear Him? Was this another miracle? If it was, He must have been doing it a lot.
But He said to them, “You give them something to eat.” And they said, “We have no more than five loaves and two fish, unless we go and buy food for all these people.”
Luke 9:14 NKJV
There are many examples of public speakers having trained their voices to be able to accomplish such feats. John Wesley was famous for this, and also Demosthenes in Classical times. So I'm not surprised our Lord was able to do so. It does demonstrate another aspect of His diligent preparation: such a voice has to be developed.
Our Lord tended to organize things, didn't He?
He did absolutely everything "decently and in order" (1Cor.14:40).
This command used to puzzle me. I understand that many times when He told people He had done a miracle for to not say anything about it it was to reduce attention directed toward Him. But this seems a bit different. My thought right now is that telling the Jews that He was their Messiah was just provoking them at the wrong time. They did not accept Him so He was not going to tell them Who He really was not until it was time for Him to go to the Cross. Am I right in that understanding, Sir?
And He strictly warned and commanded them to tell this to no one,
Luke 9:21 NKJV
Yes, that is correct. We are told that He gave everything in parables because of their unwillingness to hear (e.g., Matt.13:10ff.; 13:34ff.), and told us to beware of casting pearls before swine for fear of being trampled by the ungrateful (Matt.7:6). This is a good lesson for the over-eager. For while being overly reluctant to share the truth with others is not commendable, being overly-eager also carries its own liabilities. Knowing precisely the right time, place and manner of speaking the truth is thus another thing we can learn from our Lord's example.
It surprised me to learn that I had lost sight of the "daily" in this command. For a long time, it was a big theme in my life that you carried the Cross daily - which at the time meant that I had to find some way or must at least be willing to suffer some inconvenience for the Lord everyday. But after I started studying Ichthys, I've learned just how hard it is to make Bible study, prayer and diligent, studious application of the truths of the Bible to one's daily life can be. To be sure, I am more surprised than I can imagine anybody being that I have learned as much as I have and changed as much as I have but to also see how easy it is to fail to read the Bible one day, then two days, then three and it stretches on, not to mention failing to pray as well, in the face of passages like this one is an awakening. This is partly what started me up again yesterday. I realized that I don't have tomorrow or next week or "when I have sorted this or that out". You had taught me that already but to my shame some of these lessons take a while to really come home to me. I came to appreciate that all I have is today, right now. If I am not reading the Bible today or praying for the Church today or studiously seeking understanding of the truths I find in the Bible today or believing it today or applying it today, then I am not doing any spiritual growing or producing today. Simple. And that means that today I am not pleasing God. Isn't that right, Sir? You did tell me in our very early emails that there will always be some reason to fail to do as we should. We could be too busy or too tired. But what needs to be done, what we are commanded to do is still our duty to do. And when we don't do it, we have failed to please our Commanding Officer. And that we pleased Him or failed to please Him TODAY is all that counts, right, Sir?
Then He said to them all, “If anyone desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow Me.
Luke 9:23 NKJV
I would agree with you in general terms. The twin peril to avoid here is on the one hand setting a good standard that is too high to reasonably adhere to without stumbling and on the other hand completely demoralizing oneself as a result of the seemingly inevitable failure of strapping on more than one can reasonably bear. Everything we do for the Lord is good. Every improvement we can make in our approach to the end of being more effective and efficient for Him is good. But this is a growth process – and always will continue to be until we are perfect (which means perfecting will never end this side of heaven). More to the point of this command is the need to keep the proper mindset at all times day by day. That is a struggle too. When we remember to "carry our cross" we are reminded that our cross is very light compared to His, and that at the end of our road, even if it were to end in martyrdom, we will find ourselves before Him in glory a split-second later. None of us will have to die for a single sin – because He died for them all. So keeping the cross we are to carry in mind at all times and seeking to carry it well keeps our mission in the forefront of our thinking: we all have a cross to carry to a place the Lord is leading us, we all have a purpose for our lives which involves growth, progress and production in helping others. And when we see that mission in terms of the cross, we are reminded whom it is we are serving, and what He did for us so as to be able to have the great privilege of following in His footsteps.
So, the eight days count from when Peter acknowledged that our Lord is the Christ of God, Sir? And this acknowledgment was answered with a prophecy regarding His Death. I would like to refresh my memory on what you taught concerning that, Sir? And why does Matthew 17:1 say "six days later" instead of eight, Sir?
Now it came to pass, about eight days after these sayings, that He took Peter, John, and James and went up on the mountain to pray.
Luke 9:28 NKJV
This is the difference between inclusive and non-inclusive counting, neither of which corresponds to our modern thinking on the matter. We would say "seven days later" and not "on the eighth day following when counting inclusively" or "when six full days had elapsed not counting the day He said this and the one on which it happened".
What words did our Lord mean here?
“Let these words sink down into your ears, for the Son of Man is about to be betrayed into the hands of men.”
Luke 9:44 NKJV
This is a prophecy of Judas' betrayal and the resultant crucifixion. For the sake of His disciples, our Lord is emphatic about that here (hence the special language) because of the great revelation that the three had been given to see and the great miracle that had just taken place: such a thing as the crucifixion was deemed impossible in their minds despite His continual prediction of it. I suppose that is loosely analogous to Christians today who ignore the possibility of the Tribulation ACTUALLY happening and them finding themselves in it, even if they have heard true teaching on the subject.
Why were they afraid to ask Him what He meant?
But they did not understand this saying, and it was hidden from them so that they did not perceive it; and they were afraid to ask Him about this saying.
Luke 9:45 NKJV
Probably because 1) they had heard this before and were embarrassed to admit that they didn't understand yet AND didn't accept it; and 2) they were no doubt also afraid to get more details about something they hoped wouldn't happen.
Part of verse 55 and then whole of the next verse except for "and they went on to another village" is said in the footnote not to be in early manuscripts. Is it a part of the Bible?
But He turned and rebuked them, and said, “You do not know what manner of spirit you are of. “For the Son of Man did not come to destroy men’s lives but to save them.” And they went to another village.
Luke 9:55-56 NKJV
It is not part of scripture; it's only in printed Bibles today because of the KJV whose inferior exemplar based on only a couple of very late mss. includes it.
Why does our Lord have these two different attitudes? The enthusiastic-sounding one appears to have cold water poured on his zeal by the Lord and the colder one is given a stirring by the Lord. The first one is a test, isn't it? And so is the second. In the first, how true that zeal is is what the Lord is revealing with His words. And in the second, the test of faith in the Lord and His ability to take care of things that the man felt responsible for is what the Lord administers, is it not? Could you explain more comprehensively to me what "let the dead bury their dead" means, Sir?
Now it happened as they journeyed on the road, that someone said to Him, “Lord, I will follow You wherever You go.” And Jesus said to him, “Foxes have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay His head.” Then He said to another, “Follow Me.” But he said, “Lord, let me first go and bury my father.”
Luke 9:57-60 NKJV
Our Lord knows the hearts of all. The one who says "I will follow You
wherever You go" probably received this reply because for whatever
reason this emotionally expressed sentiment would not prove to be true
and enduring (many people "talk the talk": cf. Matt.21:28-31). If he
really did mean it at first, when it came to suffering the deprivations
of this particular ministry, our Lord knew that this person would turn
aside (far worse than not beginning to follow in the first place; cf.
2Pet.2:21-22). It may be that this individual, impressed by the power of
our Lord's miracles and the growing "popularity" of His ministry was
looking to "hitch his wagon to a star", as we say. Our Lord's words are
in that case a rebuke of his faulty motives.
In the case of the one who says "let me first go and bury my father", our Lord discerns that this is just an excuse from a person who wants to put on a good show but not actually follow through (as in the case of a person who boasts of gifts never given: Prov.25:14). He wants credit for "being willing" (though he is not), even while he really has no intention of doing what he says. Our Lord therefore "calls" him on it. Incidentally, this in not a case of the father being dead and the funeral being the next day; the man is saying he has responsibilities to his family, but once these are discharged (who knows how long in the future), he'll do God's will.
What is the difference between this third case and the second so that our Lord responds this way to the man here?
And another also said, “Lord, I will follow You, but let me first go and bid them farewell who are at my house.” But Jesus said to him, “No one, having put his hand to the plow, and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of God.”
Luke 9:61-62 NKJV
The "problem" is the same, but in this case the man is genuinely interested in following our Lord – but he is not realizing that to go back home and attend to his affairs is going to cause him to become enmeshed in them again and not follow after all. Our Lord is very direct because of the terrible downside of "not getting to it", even when there really is a genuine spark.
Why do some manuscripts read one thing here while others read another? The footnote says that some manuscripts read 72 although it reads 70 here. I know that you hold that the correct reading is 72 and I believe you. But I don't remember too well anymore why there is this conflict. If I remember right, it has something to do with the similarity of mission that these have with the 144 000 whose number is actually a doubling of 72 with a multiplication of a 1000. Could you explain it to me again, Sir?
After these things the Lord appointed seventy others also,[some mss. say 72] and sent them two by two before His face into every city and place where He Himself was about to go.
Luke 10:1 NKJV
"70" is a "magic" number and that led to mistaken readings, whether a deliberate false "correction" or a natural slip. But the number is 72, a multiple of 12 and also 144K. See the link.
So, first the 12, then the 72 and finally the 144 000. The same mission and the same provisions.
Similar mission indeed and similar provisions, but, e.g., the 144,000 are all martyred at the same time. We don't know the fate of all of the twelve (Paul, of course, is enlisted later to replace Judas), but those who were martyred or predicted to be martyred (as with Peter) did not die at the same time, and we have no idea what happened to the 72, but we have no indication from scripture that they too were martyred (which may have been the case later on).
This puts me in mind of the ministry of the 144 000 too. Their special sealing also protects them from harm and it is around the conclusion of their own ministry that Satan loses his place in the heavens and is thrown down to the earth. So, our Lord's words here are also a prophecy about the 144 000 and the times in which they will work?
And He said to them, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven. Behold, I give you the authority to trample on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall by any means hurt you. Nevertheless do not rejoice in this, that the spirits are subject to you, but rather rejoice because your names are written in heaven.”
Luke 10:18-20 NKJV
It's an excellent observation about the collocation of the "fall" our Lord relates here and the conclusion of the 144K ministry at that same time, the Tribulation's mid-point (when Satan and his angels are thrown down to earth and the 144,000 are martyred as the "first fruits" of the Great Persecution).
On the Good Samaritan, on the surface, this seems to say that we should be willing to help anyone we run into who is in material trouble. But this is not what our Lord is saying, is it? How do we interpret this passage in view of our calling to learn and grow in God's Truth and help others who are willing to do the same?
But he, wanting to justify himself, said to Jesus, “And who is my neighbor?”
Luke 10:29-37 NKJV
I wouldn't say "anyone": 1) a "neighbor" is a believer in scripture first and foremost (e.g., Rom.15:2; Eph.4:25; Jas.2:5-10); while that is not to say that unbelievers should never be helped, believers are the ones to whom we are to direct our gaze (cf. Jas.2:15-17). Samaritans were considered "marginal" members of the community of faith if members at all, so this man's willingness to help a believer (all Israelites were supposed to be believers) further redounds to his credit; 2) the wounded man is in ABSOLUTE and IMMEDIATE need with no doubt about it AND with no one else around to help: if the Samaritan does not help, he will most likely die; 3) there is no danger posed to the Samaritan by this man inasmuch as he is helpless; so there is no chance that the Samaritan will be robed or "scammed" because the need is genuine; 4) the Samaritan clearly has the means, and while he does go out of his way and do wonderful things, the sense I get from the story is that he is not put off of his journey, he does not expend resources that are voluminous, nor more than he is easily able to spend; 5) once he has taken care of the man, he goes on his way, albeit with assurances that the man will be taken care of at his expense. So we rightly laud what the Samaritan did, but there are so many things here which are different from the sort of "guilt trip" charity that Christians are often "guilted into" that they need to be noticed and carefully considered.
I've always wanted to be like Mary but then I worry about getting Jesus something to eat sometimes. This is our arrogance, isn't it? He does not need us to give Him anything. We need Him to give us everything. I think that was what Mary totally got that me and Martha struggle with at least sometimes.
"But one thing is needed, and Mary has chosen that good part, which will not be taken away from her."
Luke 10:42 NKJV
Everything is about choice. This makes the point very clearly that if it is a question of material service or a once in a lifetime opportunity to listen to the Lord's teaching, the latter is certainly better. And there are plenty of religions (some putatively Christian) where it's all about service with NO learning of the truth. Clearly, that is the wrong priority. We don't eschew service, but we put it in its proper place.
In the footnote, it says that phrases from Matthew 6:9-13 were added to make the two passages similar. But I can't tell what was added. What text was added there?
So He said to them, “When you pray, say:
Our Father in heaven,
Hallowed be Your name.
Your kingdom come.
Your will be done
On earth as it is in heaven.
Give us day by day our daily bread.
And forgive us our sins,
For we also forgive everyone who is indebted to us.
And do not lead us into temptation,
But deliver us from the evil one.”
Luke 11:2-4 NKJV
You'll have to tell me what English version you're referring too. The two prayers are slightly different in the original Greek, and it is true that some versions (as well as some Greek mss.) have assimilated the two. For instance, Luke says only, "Father", while Matthew qualifies, "Our Father, the One in the heavens" at the beginning. The substance of the two prayers is identical, however, and it is somewhat ironic that feuds over precise verbiage here manage to overlook the powerful meaning encapsulated in this prayer of all prayers (please see the links:
The Lord's Prayer I
The Lord's Prayer II
When we pray this, we are reminding ourselves that God Himself is our Father (and thinking about who He is and what that means) that His holiness will be established in a perfect world to come, that our true home and existence is there when He rules all and there is no rebellious creature free will, and that in the meantime we have been totally provided for, in forgiveness of our sins (looking backward at salvation and the cross), in provision for everything we need in this world today, and in deliverance through to the end to the resurrection or being taken back to Him. In other words, we already have what we are praying for and this prayer is the perfect one to reorient ourselves to these transcending heavenly realities we ought never to allow to slip from our hearts and minds. But arguing over words . . .
Were there other people besides the Lord casting out demons then? Were the children of the Pharisees casting out demons too?
"And if I cast out demons by Beelzebub, by whom do your sons cast them out? Therefore they will be your judges."
Luke 11:19 NKJV
They were going through the motions, but they had no actual power to do this – analogous to all those today who pretend to perform exorcisms today. Our Lord's point is that if their sons pretended to such power, then it was doubly hypocritical of them to cast doubt upon Him who was actually casting out demons in fact.
What did Jesus mean by "today...and tomorrow...and the third day" and by "I will reach my goal (or be perfected as in the footnote)"?
And He said to them, “Go, tell that fox, ‘Behold, I cast out demons and perform cures today and tomorrow, and the third day I shall be perfected.’
Luke 13:32 NKJV
This is a prediction of His three and a half year ministry and its conclusion – but also of the resurrection on the third day.
What does this teaching mean? I have come to think that charity to the poor is not really what the Gospel is about. So, this is a little difficult for me to understand. Is it metaphorical? If it is, what does it stand for? If our Lord meant it literally however, what are the reasonable limits here since I don't think He means that we should never invite the well-to-do to our parties if we have them? Or could this be that He was dealing specifically with the attitude of the Pharisees, that is, with their tendency to pretend that only the rich and powerful were good enough for them and they would not be seen with poor people if they could help it, to avoid being associated with the sin that made those people poor? Or is it connected somehow to verses 15 - 24?
Then He also said to him who invited Him, “When you give a dinner or a supper, do not ask your friends, your brothers, your relatives, nor rich neighbors, lest they also invite you back, and you be repaid. But when you give a feast, invite the poor, the maimed, the lame, the blind. And you will be blessed, because they cannot repay you; for you shall be repaid at the resurrection of the just.”
Luke 14:12-14 NKJV
There is charity and there is charity. Giving something genuinely needed to a believer in need is blessed. Giving money to some organization even if putatively run by believers where one has no real idea of the use to which it will be put is much less so. Spending money on oneself, one's friends, one's pleasures, may not be sinful (up to a point), but it certainly is not going to be rewarded because it is not rewardable. If we were really 100% "in" for earning eternal rewards, then we would be more inclined to do as Paul tells us, namely, "make every punch count" (1Cor.9:26). The problem people often have with our Lord's teachings such as this is that they apply them in an absolute way when they themselves are not absolutely perfect. But our Lord understands that we are not perfect. Nevertheless, everything He tells us is true. We are told, e.g., not to sin – but none of us ever comes close to fulfilling that command. What then? Shall we sin because we cannot be completely sinless? God forbid! We shall do our best to sin less and fight against sin with all our might – even though we understand that we will make mistakes and act out of selfishness from time to time. Similarly, devoting ourselves body and soul to the plan of God without compromise of any sort is beyond the strength of any Christian. What then? Shall we turn away in despair from the Will of God for our lives because we cannot be perfect? God forbid! That is the devil's trap. No, rather we shall set ourselves to running the best race we can day by day, and will try to do better every step of the way. We understand that reading our Bibles for an hour is better than sleeping for an hour. But we all need sleep. And we understand that ministering for an hour is better than attending a social function for an hour. But we all need some socializing, some friends, some family. Our Lord tells us here what is good and what is rewardable and recommends it. Of course we are going to be less than complete in our taking up of His good advice – but the more and the harder we try to do so, the greater will be our reward. So we don't have to feel that we should NEVER give a party for our friends or that we should ALWAYS stint ourselves for believers who are in need. But it is true that less of the former and more of the latter does result in a greater reward (provided, of course, correct motives, fulfillment of responsibilities to our families, genuine need on the part of actual believers receiving our benefits, etc.). Getting depressed about this passage is to take it the wrong way. Giving up everything as a result is to take it the wrong way (I doubt there is a single monk in the history of the world who is going to be highly rewarded – and I doubt the salvation of many). Becoming legalistic or shorting our families and their legitimate needs as a result of reading this is to take it the wrong way. Checking out our priorities letting the Spirit speak to us as to how we might do better as a result of reading this is the correct approach.
In the parable of the prodigal son (Lk.15:11-32). Who does the older brother represent here? Is he just part of the furniture of the parable or is he another point that Jesus was making?
"And he said to him, ‘Your brother has come, and because he has received him safe and sound, your father has killed the fatted calf.’ But he was angry and would not go in. Therefore his father came out and pleaded with him. So he answered and said to his father, ‘Lo, these many years I have been serving you; I never transgressed your commandment at any time; and yet you never gave me a young goat, that I might make merry with my friends. But as soon as this son of yours came, who has devoured your livelihood with harlots, you killed the fatted calf for him.’ "
Luke 15:27-30 NKJV
He represents 1) ungracious believers generally who take a legalistic attitude towards repentant believers, and 2) legalistic Israel of our Lord's day (cf. Matt.21:31-32). In either case, given the behavior of the older son, one wonders just how much he respected his father – he certainly had no love, even for his brother; so if legalists then and now are saved, it's in spite of their thoughts, deeds and actions which resemble more those of unbelievers.
Regarding the parable of the unjust steward (Lk.16:1-9), could you explain this parable, Sir? Why or what does it mean that "the sons of this age are more shrewd in relation to their own kind than the sons of light"?
"So the master commended the unjust steward because he had dealt shrewdly. For the sons of this world are more shrewd in their generation than the sons of light. And I say to you, make friends for yourselves by unrighteous mammon, that when you fail, they may receive you into an everlasting home."
Luke 16:8-9 NKJV
Unbelievers tend to have a better "cost benefit" appreciation of essentials than believers do. After all, if we really do believe that the smallest reward in eternity is worth more than the entire world here and now put together, that ought to motivate us to act accordingly – but in most cases believers (lukewarmness being the rule here in Laodicea) act as if they are going to live in this world forever and never have their work for Christ evaluated at all.
Does our Lord mean here that having faith at all is enough to accomplish the impossible? That is, was He saying that the apostles did not need to have their Faith increased but to have it at all? If He was, how does that work with the many times that He rebuked them for having small faith? Otherwise, what does He mean here?
“And if he sins against you seven times in a day, and seven times in a day returns to you, saying, ‘I repent,’ you shall forgive him.” And the apostles said to the Lord, “Increase our faith.”
Luke 17:4-5 NKJV
In verses 4-5, our Lord is calling for an attitude and a policy of complete forgiveness of our brothers and sisters whenever they ask for it. This was hard for the disciples to accept (i.e., they didn't want to sign on to doing it). In verse six and following, you are correct that faith is something that can grow. Our Lord is saying that even a small amount of genuine faith is capable of anything – but also that they were acting as if they didn't even have that small amount.
Just to be sure, this passage is speaking of the Resurrection?
"I tell you, in that night there will be two men in one bed: the one will be taken and the other will be left. Two women will be grinding together: the one will be taken and the other left."
Luke 17:34-35 NKJV
Yes – at the second advent.
Is this part of the Bible?
“Two men will be in the field: the one will be taken and the other left.”
Luke 17:36 NKJV
This appears to be an assimilation (in some mss.) from Matthew 24:40. It's missing in ms. Aleph. On the other hand, D (Beza), wherein it does occur, is a good witness (though in the minority by a considerable amount here). This is a place where one could see how it could have gone either way, that is, this is an easy additional detail in a sequence that might have been accidentally skipped; or on the other hand if it were left out here by the Spirit one could see how the lack of the passage might have been filled in by a scribe familiar with Matthew's account. The important thing is that Jesus did say this as we know from Matthew, so it is part of scripture, even if not part of Luke.
I assume that this "they" refers to the Pharisees and the Scribes etc. Or could it have been the crowd that is always present when He is out and about?
But when they saw it, they all complained, saying, “He has gone to be a guest with a man who is a sinner.”
Luke 19:7 NKJV
Scripture says "all", so we may assume that this was the universal reaction (even if there were some few exceptions). This is a very good point not to miss. Even though everyone in Israel was – at that moment – praising Him, the same crowd would soon be calling for His crucifixion. No everyone who says, "Lord, Lord" will be saved (Matt.7:21); only those who have truly put their faith in Him so as to be born anew from above.
I believe you teach that our Lord bought the animals prior and put them away for His entry into Jerusalem. Is there another way then to understand why this place says "its (that is, the colt's) owners"? The footnote offers "lords" as an alternative reading to "owners". Mark does say that the people who asked were bystanders. But that does not mean that they could not have been the colt's owners/lords per Luke's account, does it, Sir?
But as they were loosing the colt, the owners of it said to them, “Why are you loosing the colt?”
Luke 19:33 NKJV
Here's what I actually wrote: "My guess is that our Lord Jesus paid for it (or rented it) out of what was left of His own private resources, and that this is why the disciples were allowed to take it when they came for it.". So the bystanders of Mark probably includes the "lords" (kyrioi) of Luke – by whom Luke means either the owners (with whom our Lord had an arrangement) or, more likely, those who had been given charge of the animals until the time He had need of them (cf. Matt.21:3; Mk.11:3; Lk.19:31).
Verses 3 - 4. What does our Lord mean here? Am I right to think that this woman's example is not that she gave even what she needed to eat with or carry out normal everyday responsibility with but that she was a woman whose whole life revolved around pleasing God so that what she gave was something she made sure to have to give to Him after fulfilling her material responsibilities? What I think I mean is, when I am trying to get a job, this woman's example teaches me to contextualize that effort in my pursuit of spiritual maturity and production so that even though my job is entirely secular and may have nothing to do with the Bible or Bible-teaching, it still is an offering to God if I choose it to allow me to pursue spiritual growth and production with maximum commitment? Is this what this place teaches?
So He said, “Truly I say to you that this poor widow has put in more than all; for all these out of their abundance have put in offerings for God, but she out of her poverty put in all the livelihood that she had.”
Luke 21:3-4 NKJV
While I agree that anything we do for the sake of the kingdom represents a sacrifice, I don't find what you reference in this passage. I think you must mean chapter 21? The widow's mite demonstrates that God bases His evaluation of us on what we have to work with. A rich man with no time constraints whatsoever who spent half an hour a day studying the Bible would not be doing as much in God's eyes as a poor man working two jobs to support a family who only managed half as much.
How far does "but before all these things..." apply in the context? And does that phrase mean that the following prophecy either is not eschatological or has a dual application to the apostles and the early Church and to the Tribulation? It is the "before" that I am confused by because I have learned from you that the Great Persecution will come AFTER the Antichrist has consolidated his power by defeating the Southern Alliance and taken control of the world which I understand from the CT series to be what vv 10 - 11 speaks of. So, if our Lord says here that the Great Persecution will come before he (the Antichrist) consolidated his power, it is confusing. This is why I think that He was prophesying of the persecution that the early Church will face. But how far then does the "...before..." go in the context because much of what follows seems to me to apply to the Tribulation as well?
“But before all these things, they will lay their hands on you and persecute you, delivering you up to the synagogues and prisons. You will be brought before kings and rulers for My name’s sake.
Luke 21:12 NKJV
It's the English translation that is the problem here. My translation:
But, [what is] even more [grievous] than these things (i.e., the disruptions of the Tribulation's first half),(48) they will lay hands upon them (i.e., believers during the Great Persecution), betraying them into [the hands of] their [religious] assemblies and prisons, haling them before kings and governors for the sake of my Name.
From fn #48 in CT 4:
The use of the Greek preposition pro in the phrase pro de touton (πρὸ δὲ τούτων) is misunderstood in the versions as being temporal, whereas it should be taken here as preferential in degree rather than in time, that is "more significant" rather than "more recent" (cf. 1Tim.2:1; Jas.5:12; 1Pet.4:8). The point is that for believers the Great Persecution will be much more of a shock to the system than even the horrendous and notable judgments for which the Tribulation is renowned.
What does our Lord mean here? He cannot mean that the apostles or we later in the Tribulation will not be martyred, does He? Does He speak of eternal perishing here? It seems to me the most likely interpretation. And it seems to me to be what verse 19 is speaking of: that if we endure everything that will come at us without giving up our faith, we will be saved.
"But not a hair of your head shall be lost. By your patience possess your souls."
Luke 21:18-19 NKJV
It means that we don't have to worry at all about what will happen to us in the Tribulation (or now – or then, in the case of the disciples): nothing can stop the plan of God from being perfectly carried out. If it is our Lord's will for us to minister the truth during the Tribulation, we will be kept safe in doing so – right up until the point when we are brought home in martyrdom honoring Him. And if it is His will for us to endure until the second advent, nothing can stop that either. But we do have to understand that these will be tough times:
If anyone [is marked] for captivity, he is going into captivity. If anyone [is marked] for death by the sword, by the sword [he must] be killed. Therefore endurance and faith [on the part] of [my] sanctified ones is [called for].
The "vengeance" spoken of here is the Antichrist's for Israel's revolt against his rule, isn't it, so that Daniel's prophecy (Daniel 11:44? The North here is Israel, right, Sir?) will be fulfilled?
"For these are the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled."
Luke 21:22 NKJV
The Greek word ekdikesis is better rendered "retribution". Since the purpose of the retribution is to "fulfill all that has been written", it is better to take this as the completion of God's wrath against the forces of evil, human and angelic:
Then I saw another sign in heaven, great and marvelous: seven angels having the seven last plagues, for in them the wrath of God is complete.
Revelation 15:1 NKJV
Is our Lord confirming here that the Tribulation is a time to be bold about our faith and confident rather than timid and fearful? So, while we should not arrogantly put ourselves in harm's way by unnecessarily antagonizing the world at the time, we most definitely should not hide our Faith away or try to play nice to avoid trouble?
“Now when these things begin to happen, look up and lift up your heads, because your redemption draws near.”
Luke 21:28 NKJV
The Great Tribulation will be especially difficult – hence the name. But our Lord gives us in this chapter a general outline of what will happen. Since we know that at the end of this He returns and we who remain alive are resurrected, though we are not given to know "the hour and the day", yet we are to discern that our deliverance, "redemption" (meaning of the body = the resurrection) is very close, when we see these things He tells us about in advance begin to happen.
If we are to recognize what "these things" are, we must study them to know them, must we not? So, it is foolishness, isn't it, Sir, to say that we don't need to trouble ourselves learning them now because, as one of the believers I speak with in that WhatsApp group often says and I paraphrase, "the Holy Spirit will get us through that time if we have to live through it"? I know that you always shared this passage with me when we discussed knowing the time but I think that it is only now that I understand how they say that we must be diligent in studying eschatology in order to know when these things are happening.
"So you also, when you see these things happening, know that the kingdom of God is near."
Luke 21:31 NKJV
This is restatement by our Lord of the same principle of verse 28 after using the parable of the fig tree to explain it. So you are absolutely correct. In any case, I think this is obvious. The reason why most believers are not concerned with eschatology is either because 1) they are not concerned about the Bible and spiritual growth generally, and/or 2) they believe in the fallacious "pre-Trib rapture" teaching which erroneously proclaims that believers will not have to endure the Tribulation – so of course there is no need to be serious about studying what the Bible has to say about it.
Should it read "for they were afraid of the people" or should it rather read" but they were afraid of the people"? Why would fear of the people motivate the chief priests and scribes to kill the Lord?
And the chief priests and the scribes sought how they might kill Him, for they feared the people.
Luke 22:2 NKJV
The people believed Jesus was a prophet and had just turned out in force to welcome Him into Jerusalem on palm Sunday. The leaders were concerned that if they killed Him outright they might be stoned by the people. Compare:
And although [Herod] wanted to put [John] to death, he feared the multitude, because they counted him as a prophet.
Is there a dual application here? Will the apostles rule the twelve tribes of the ethnic nation Israel in the Millennium and the whole Body of Christ organized into twelve divisions as Eternal Israel too? Or does our Lord only mean the latter? Also, should I understand from your teachings that Eternal Israel is all the Family of God including the Angels, the Church and the Millennial Believers? Or is it only the Church or only the Human side of God's Family?
". . . that you may eat and drink at My table in My kingdom, and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel."
Luke 22:30 NKJV
This refers to the entrance into the land of Jews who return to the land
(see the link:
"The regathering and purging of Israel").
As to the eternal Israel, the Church, this is composed of all believers from Adam and Eve to the last person saved during the Tribulation. The Friends of the Bride and the elect angels are the two other elements of the family of God.
The footnote says, "obtained by asking" as an alternative reading to "demanded permission". Does this mean that Satan was given permission to sift Peter like wheat? I personally thought he did because of Peter's later denial of Christ. I am not sure now. What is the Truth here, Sir?
And the Lord said, "Simon, Simon! Indeed, Satan has asked for you, that he may sift you as wheat."
Luke 22:31 NKJV
The verb is a compound with ex- which does make it intensive, but the verb only occasionally means "to get what one wants"; more often, as here, it means "to ask emphatically".
I note here a difference. It seems to me that the provision of a money bag is not as "commanded" as the provision of a sword. The money bag is to be taken by those who have it but if anyone does not possess a sword, he should take pains to acquire one. It seems to me then that it is up to those who minister as teachers to determine whether they can provide for themselves as they minister and to do so, otherwise they are free to use the material support of those to whom they minister. I wonder however if this does not go further. Can we also say that for the Church in general, any believer who possesses wealth or can with their talents should not just throw it all away because they have become believers but should use it for their Walk of Faith and those who cannot should not be shy of leaning on their wealthier brothers for support in their own race? But for all, teachers and other gifts alike, everyone should make sure to take appropriate measures to protect themselves from criminal persecution and harm as far as possible. Is this a good interpretation? Or is it just a good application? Or does it completely miss the point?
Then He said to them, "But now, he who has a money bag, let him take it, and likewise a knapsack; and he who has no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one."
Luke 22:36 NKJV
I think rather that swords are more expensive than the other items and also more easily thought to be unnecessary. The point of our Lord's words here is to let the disciples know ahead of time that the special protection and provision they enjoyed as heralds of the Messiah was going to lapse, and that as apostles of His growing Church they would need to make their way through this world in the normal way. Of course, they as we are indeed supernaturally protected and provided for. But in this time that is not evident to the fleshly eye (though we know it and feel it), nor given without our participation in doing what we need to do (though this is merely to let us demonstrate our faithfulness as God could certainly do for us as He did for them if that were what the ground rules for this dispensation enjoined).
Why are two swords enough for a group of thirteen men?
So they said, “Lord, look, here are two swords.” And He said to them, “It is enough.”
Luke 22:38 NKJV
Our Lord was not calling for an inventory, so His words here are meant for the future, not the present (and circumstances always change). From part of Luke Questions:
"Enough" is misleading for our purposes here because in English this refers to quantity so one might wrongly assume that our Lord is talking about the number of swords. However, the Greek verb eao has nothing whatsoever to do with quantity; it means "allow", or in this context, "let it go" / "leave this topic now" / "that's enough [of that]".
The footnote says that these verses are not in early manuscripts. Are they part of the Bible?
Then an angel appeared to Him from heaven, strengthening Him. And being in agony, He prayed more earnestly. Then His sweat became like great drops of blood falling down to the ground.
Luke 22:43-44 NKJV
No. It's a late insertion and not part of scripture.
The footnote says "Or 'Let Me at least do this'". Which is what the Lord said? Did He say this or "No more of this"?
But Jesus answered and said, “Permit even this.” And He touched his ear and healed him.
Luke 22:51 NKJV
NIV's “No more of this!” is correct.
NASB says that Jesus answered "Yes I am" and adds in the footnote, "Literally, 'You say that I am'". I am more familiar with the latter answer and it has always puzzled me that the Jews took it to be an admission rather than an accusation. How did they say that He was? Now that I am thinking about it, I am thinking that He meant that they were doing to Him everything that prophecy said that they would do to the Son of God and were thus by their actions saying or confirming that He was indeed the Son of God. It seems that they understood this. Is that right? Did I figure this all right?
Then they all said, “Are You then the Son of God?” So He said to them, “You rightly say that I am.”
Luke 22:70 NKJV
I agree with you that they are verifying this by their actions, but the precise meaning is that they are accusing Him of blasphemy so as to be able to condemn Him, and the supposed blasphemy is just this. So while technically they are asking Him a question, in fact they are making an accusation, which is just what the Lord – in cutting through all the deception – tells them: "You are saying [through your accusations] that 'I AM' [God] – [and you are correct]".
Is this verse a part of the Bible?
(for it was necessary for him to release one to them at the feast).
Luke 23:17 NKJV
Yes, but it fell out of a number of the mss. traditions early on.
Our Lord already said here that the Gospel was to go to all the nations beginning from Jerusalem. This puts me in mind of how much I often have to hear something before I get it. That seems to me to be what happened to the apostles and the rest of the early believers.
"and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in His name to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem."
Luke 24:47 NKJV
Was it in Bethany that Jesus ascended into Heaven? The Ascension is said to have happened on Olivet (Acts 1:12). Is Olivet in Bethany then?
(50) And He led them out as far as Bethany, and He lifted up His hands and blessed them. (51) And it came to pass as He was blessing them that He disappeared from their [sight]. (52) Then, having worshiped Him of their own accord, they returned to Jerusalem with great joy.
Notice that "and was taken up into heaven" is not present in my translation above. This part of verse 51 is a later addition, no doubt added by someone who thought that this was the ascension. It is not. This is our Lord disappearing from the eleven as He did on a number of occasions during His time on earth after the resurrection (also at Lk.24:31 previously in the same chapter).
P.S.: If you haven't noticed or already done so, please check out the list of wonderful ministry offerings on the Special Topics page, including postings by Bartek Sylwestrzak (*series on Mary now complete!), Christian Vassallo, John Jackson, "Bible Readings by Emma", Bible Reading Log by Christian Vassallo (helps for reading through the English Bible), The Holocaust: A Biblical and Historical Examination (Future Implications) by Fred London, the Expanded Index to Old Testment translations at Ichthys, Foundational Principles, by Odii Ariwodo, and, most recently, "The Peter series" translated into Kiswahili by Resi Kilambo.
Special Prayer Requests
A special word of thanks to all who have been praying for this ministry. The Lord has brought about a great deliverance for me and mine. I am forever grateful to Him, and also to all of you who have been faithfully interceding for me and for this ministry.
The Lord is my strength and my song, and He has become my salvation.
Addendum: 12/24/16: I also want to thank everyone who has been praying for my family and especially for my mother. She passed away yesterday morning at the age of ninety-six. Considering the sad shape she was in, it was a blessing that the Lord took her when He did. She died "full of years" in the company of those who loved her, and now she is with the Lord – and nothing is better than that (Phil.1:23; Rev.7:17; 21:4).
Update on Urgent Prayer Request For Vau (5/29/19):
Hello Brother Bob, Vau passed this morning. He is now with our Lord. Please continue to lift our family up in prayer.
Sister Shevetta Washington
More Prayer Requests:
More E-mails: Complete archive of previous emails: Ichthys' Emails
Fighting the Fight XI
Apologetics and Legalism II
Ministry and Preparation for Ministry IX
Gospel Questions XIV
The 'Rapture' and other Eschatological Issues
Ministry and Preparation for Ministry VIII
Marriage and the Bible VIII
Believers in the World IX
Biblical Interpretation XI
Salvation, the Gospel, and Unbelief VI
Cults and Christianity XII
Eschatology Issues XXVII
Theological Questions III
New Testament Interpretation VIII
Eschatology Issues XXVI
Old Testament Interpretation XIV
Politics versus Spiritual Growth IV
Old Testament Interpretation XIII
Salvation, the Gospel, and Unbelief V
Biblical Interpretation X
Fighting the Fight X
Politics versus Spiritual Growth III
Baptism: Water and Spirit IX
Biblical Anthropology VIII
Faith, Forgiveness, Salvation IV
Genesis Questions IV
Fighting the Fight IX
Eschatology Issues XXV
Angelic Issues IX
Ministry and Preparation for Ministry VII
Legalism, Past, Present and Future IV
New Testament Interpretation VII
Eschatology Issues XXIV: the 'Rapture' et al.
Believers in the World VIII: Coping with Family
Salvation, the Gospel, and Unbelief IV
Believers in the World VII
Culture and Christianity XX
Biblical Languages, Texts and Translations XI
Cults and Christianity XI
Spiritual Gifts and False Teaching
Angelic Issues VIII
Christology Questions X
Believers in the World VI
Genesis Gap: Questions and Answers VI
Atheism and Evangelism
New Testament Interpretation VI
Old Testament Interpretation XII
Fighting the Fight VIII
Spiritual Warfare VI
Sin, Faith and Suffering
Prayer, Vows and Confession
Eschatology Issues XXIII
Apologetics, Ministry and False Teaching
Culture and Christianity XIX
Ministry and Preparation for Ministry VI
Church: The Biblical Ideal versus the Contemporary Reality II
Salvation, the Gospel, and Unbelief III
Fighting the Fight VII
The Holy Spirit: Pneumatology Questions VI
Interpretation, Application, Exegesis and Ministry
Biblical Anthropology VII
Baptism: Water and Spirit VIII
Text and Canon
New Testament Interpretation V
Grace versus Law II
Apathy, Atheism, Cults and False Teaching
All about Ichthys III
The Battlefield Within II: Combating anger, fear, blaming God, blaming others
Salvation Questions III
Faith, Forgiveness, Salvation III
Eschatology Issues XXII
Cults and Christianity X
Cults and Christianity IX
Ministry and Preparation for Ministry V
Fighting the Fight VI
Marriage and the Bible VII
Culture and Christianity XVIII: Substance Use and Abuse, Tithing, Politics and Environmentalism, Friendship, Self-Defense, and Work
Paul the Apostle: Aspects of his Life and Ministry II
Old Testament Interpretation XI
Mutual Encouragement in Christ VII
The Transitional Era of the Book of Acts and its Unique Spiritual Gifts
Old Testament Interpretation X
Marriage and the Bible VI
The pre-Trib 'Rapture': so called 'imminence' and other false proofs refuted
Encouragement, Spiritual Testing and Spiritual Growth III
Eschatology Issues XXI
Eschatology Issues XX
Biblical Languages, Texts and Translations X
Legalism, Past and Present III: Sabbath observance, tithing, dietary regulations and other issues
Believers in the World V: Ministering, Mutually Encouraging, and Coping with Family, Politics, and Health
Salvation, the Gospel, and Unbelief II
Old Testament Interpretation IX
Christology Questions IX: Christ and His Church
Mutual Encouragement in Christ VI: Perseverance
Science and the Bible III
Faith, Forgiveness, Salvation II
Eschatology Issues XIX
Ministry and Preparation for Ministry IV
Bible Interpretation IX
Marriage and the Bible V
Gospel Questions XIII
Biblical Anthropology VI
Cults and Christianity VIII
Fighting the Fight V: Dispatches from the Laodicean 'Front' II
Old Testament Interpretation VIII
Eschatology Issues XVIII
Spiritual Growth III
Ministry and Preparation for Ministry III
Sin, Guilt, and Salvation II
New Testament Interpretation IV
Biblical Languages, Texts and Translations IX
Peace, Reconciliation and Salvation
Mutual Encouragement in Christ V: Soldiers of the Cross
Baptism: Water and Spirit VII
Faith, Forgiveness, Salvation
Cults and Christianity VII
Old Testament Interpretation VII
Sin, Guilt, and Salvation
Eschatology Issues XVII
Dangers of the Pre-Trib Rapture False Teaching
Biblical Languages, Texts and Translations VIII
The Infinity, Magnitude, Glory, Providence and Plan of God
Eschatology Issues XVI
Gospel Questions XII
The Bible and the Canon: The Inspired Word of God IV
Nephilim, Antichrist, the False Prophet and the Mark of the Beast
Angelic Issues VII
Prayer Questions II
The Trinity and Messianic Legalism II
Annihilationism, Universalism, Hell and Judgment II
Atheism and Apologetics II
Politics versus Spiritual Growth II
Culture and Christianity XVII: Humor, Self-Defense, Pacifism and War
Culture and Christianity XVI: Alcohol, Money and Dietary Issues
Dreams, Visions, Miracles, Exorcism, Tongues, and False Prophets
Calvinism, Catholicism and Ichthys
Apologetics, Legalism, Cults and Philosophy
The Law, Legalism, and Rome
Mutual Encouragement in Christ IV
Genesis Gap: Questions and Answers V
Faith and Free Will in Trial and Testing
Free Will and God's WILL in Salvation
Jobs, Money, Finances and Giving: What does the Bible say?
Ministry and Preparation for Ministry II
Eschatology Issues XV
Dealing with Sin and Guilt
Mutual Encouragement in Christ III
Preparing for Tribulation II
It is Better on the Other Side
Christology Questions VIII: The Deity, Humanity and Life of Christ
The Lives of the Apostles and the Writing of the New Testament II
Biblical People and Places: Eve, Cain, Noah, Abraham, Hagar, Esau, Joseph and more
Biblical Anthropology V: Body, Spirit and 'Soul', Present and Future
Satan, Antichrist, the False Prophet and the Mark of the Beast
The Holy Spirit: Pneumatology Questions V
Prophets, Prophecy, and False Prophets
Christology Questions VII: The Life and Spiritual Death of Christ and Holy Communion
The Bible and the Canon: The Inspired Word of God III
Culture and Christianity XV: The Bible vs. some Sensitive Social and Political Issues
Christology Questions VI: Christophany, Deity and the Spiritual Death of Christ
Encouragement, Spiritual Testing and Spiritual Growth II
Spiritual Warfare V
Cults and Christianity VI
Fighting the Fight IV: Dispatches from the Laodicean 'Front'
Eschatology Issues XIV
The Gift of Tongues: Part 3
The Resurrection Body and our Eternal Future II
Gospel Questions XI
Blindness, Disease and Healing
Ministry and Preparation for Ministry
Atheism and Apologetics
Biblical Languages, Texts and Translations VII
Church History II
Salvation Questions II
Culture and Christianity XIV
Encouragement, Spiritual Testing and Spiritual Growth
Judaism and Legalism in the church-visible
Bible Interpretation VIII
Apostasy, Sin and Salvation
Confronting False Groups and False Teaching III
Eschatology Issues XIII: Time of the Tribulation and the Resurrection, Antichrist and the Mark of the Beast
Theological Questions II
The Holy Spirit: Pneumatology Questions IV
Old Testament Interpretation VI
More Questions on the Book of Hebrews: Melchizedek, Esau, and the 'Impossibility' of Being Restored
Believers in the World IV: Making Godly Choices vs. Following Man-Made Rules
Guilt, Sin and Victory through Spiritual Growth
Confronting False Groups and False Teaching II
Cults and Christianity V
Politics versus Spiritual Growth
Christian Struggle, Perseverance and Deliverance
The Bible and the Natural World
Sin, Fear and Forgiveness
An Extended Conversation on the 'Unpardonable' Sin
Eternal Realities: Real Heaven, Real Hell
Eschatology Issues XII: Babylon, Armageddon, Israel, 2026
Ministers, Ministry, and Preparation for Ministry
Evangelism in Principle and Practice II
Gospel Questions X: Glory, John the baptist, the hidden talent, the Kingdom of God
Old Testament Interpretation V: The Flight to Egypt, the Virgin Birth, Jonathan's Choice, Tyre in Prophecy
Matthew Questions, verse by verse
Marriage and the Bible IV
Politics and Political Action on the Eve of the Tribulation
Bible Versions, Bible Translation, and Bible Reading IV
Spiritual Growth II
Mutual Encouragement in Christ II
Baptism: Water and Spirit VI
Science and the Bible II
Genesis Gap: Questions and Answers IV
Culture and Christianity XIII: College, Dating, Marriage and Friendship
Eschatology Issues XI: Trumpets, the Millennium, the Time of the Tribulation and the Resurrection.
Sin according to the Bible: Hamartiology II
Bible Interpretation VII
Salvation and Sin
Bible Interpretation VI
Eschatology Issues X: Strong delusion, blood moons, 2026, imminence, apostasy & the mark of the beast
Angelic Issues VI: Cherubs, Guardians, Elders and 'gods'
Sin according to the Bible: Hamartiology I
Bible Chronology, Aramaic and Interpretation
Christians and Mental Illness
Culture and Christianity XII
The Trinity and Messianic Legalism
Anger, Anthropopathism, Eternity and Divine Motives
Unbelievers, Free Will, and the Plan of God II
Christology Questions V: the Baptism, Temptation and Spiritual Death of Christ
The Bible and the Canon: The Inspired Word of God II
Believers in the World III: Prosperity Gospel, Tithing, Cults and Legalism
Gospel Questions IX
Faith, Hope and Love: Virtue in Spiritual Warfare
Trinity Questions II
Some Sensitive Topics IV
Finding a Church – or Something Better? II
New Testament Interpretation III
Faith vs. History, Archaeology, Philosophy
Believers in the World II: Confronting False Groups and False Teaching
The 144,000 and the Two Witnesses of the Tribulation
Biblical Anthropology IV: Soul and Spirit, Image and Likeness, Book of Life, Life at Birth, Accountability and Infant Salvation.
Predestination, Free Will and False Teaching
Christophany and the Trinity
Love, Marriage, and Divorce: Marriage and the Bible III
Interpreting Dreams and Analyzing Prophetic Claims
Culture and Christianity XI: Lying, Suicide, Tattoos, Investing, Drugs, Music, Family, Dating, Politics
Bible Versions, Bible Translation, and Bible Reading III
Eschatology Issues IX: Amillennialism, Trumpets, and the Seven Days
Spiritual Warfare IV: Demons, Demonic Influences and Satanic Methodology
Satan's Fall from Grace
Atheism and Gnosticism: Denying the Truth about God
Sin, Salvation and Forgiveness: Claiming the Mental and Spiritual High-Ground
Struggling with Salvation . . . and Relatives
Legalism, Past and Present II
Ministry and the Ichthys Ministry II
All about Ichthys II: Mutual Encouragement in the Lord
The Book of Job and Christian Suffering
Genesis Gap: Questions and Answers III: Creationism, Neanderthals, Fossil Record
Christology Questions IV: Jesus' Birth, Baptism, Early Life, and Kenosis
Third Party Testimony III: Near Death Experiences, Revelations and Tongues
Third Party Testimony II: Charismatic Claims of Visions, Dreams and Prophecy
Third Party Testimony I: We Believe God and His Word – Not People
God Heals - in His way (not our way)
Sanctification, Separation and Restraint
Finding a Church – or Something Better?
Culture and Christianity X: Military Service, College, Politics, and Race Relations
Contemporary Churches and Women Preachers
Culture and Christianity IX: Politics, Tithing, Music, Crucifixes, Alcohol, and Gambling
Marriage and the Bible II
Biblical Anthropology III: Soul versus Spirit, "Soul Sleep", and the Interim Body
New Testament Interpretation II: Who is equal? Grace in vain. Unequally yoked.
Aspects of the Crucifixion II: Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday?
Aspects of the Crucifixion I: Carrying the cross, trials and rooster crow.
Salvation Lost and Found
The Canon: Content, Chronology, and Criticism
Spiritual Warfare III: Peter's 'Angel', Saul's Death, and Strange Events
Old Testament Interpretation IV: Gehazi's Leprosy, Tyre's Destruction, and Immanuel
Nephilim, Fallen Angels, and Genesis 6
Gospel Questions VIII
Sin, Atonement and Forgiveness II
Sin, Atonement and Forgiveness I
Annihilationism, Universalism, Hell and Judgment
When is the Rapture?
Noah, the Flood, and the Nature of Animals
The Tribulation: Timing of, Preparation for, and Conditions in
Eschatology Issues VIII: Revelation, Tribulation and Judgment
Antichrist: the Mark, the Number, and the Identification of the Beast
Satan's Revolt and the Tribulation to Come
Old Testament Interpretation III: The Name 'Jacob', the Mark of Cain, Jeshrun.
Old Testament Interpretation II: Urim and Thummim, the Bronze Serpent, the Ark.
Being Saved: Security, Apostasy, and the Sin unto Death
Fighting the Fight III: False Teaching, Local Churches, and the Truth
Fighting the Fight II: Struggling with Sin, Doubt, and Severe Testing
Fighting the Fight I: Accountability, Faith, Sin, Forgiveness, and Reward
Dispensations, Covenants, Israel and the Church II
Dispensations, Covenants, Israel and the Church I
Witnessing: Cults and Christianity II
Witnessing: Cults and Christianity I
Ministry and the Ichthys Ministry
Biblical Interpretation V
Baptism: Water and Spirit V
Spiritual Growth, Church-Searching and "Discipling"
Unbelievers, Free Will, and the Plan of God
Biblical Languages, Texts and Translations VI
Baptism: Water and Spirit IV
Paganism, Idolatry, Mythology and the Occult
The Lives of the Apostles and the Writing of the New Testament
The Essence of God and Deity of Christ
Parables and their Interpretation
The Meaning and Purpose of True Christian Assembly
Marriage and the Bible
Spiritual 'ups' and 'downs'
1st John: Text and Interpretation
Eschatology Issues VII
Perseverance in the latter days of Laodicea
Baptism: Water and Spirit III
Prayer: the Persistence, Purpose and Power of.
Paul the Apostle: Aspects of his Life and Ministry
Gospel Questions VII: The Wedding at Cana et al.
Israel, 'Lost Tribes' and the Star of David
Israel and Antichrist
Explaining and Defending the Trinity and the Person of Christ II
The Holy Spirit: Pneumatology Questions III
Culture and Christianity VIII
The Geography of Heaven, Hades and 'Hell'.
Eschatology Issues VI
Bible Interpretation IV
Legalism, Past and Present
The Resurrection Body and our Eternal Future.
Christ the First-Born, High Priest in the Order of Melchizedek.
Bible Versions, Bible Translation, and Bible Reading II
Bible Versions, Bible Translation, and Bible Reading
Hermeneutics, Typology, Christophany, Theophany and Anthropopathism.
No, Hebrews does not teach that you lost your salvation.
Gospel Questions VI: the Long Ending of Mark et al.
Judas and the Betrayal of Christ
Doubting Salvation and Questions of Sin
The 144,000: God's Seal vs. the Mark of the Beast
Atheism: Putting Truth to Death
War in Heaven II
The Holy Spirit: Pneumatology Questions II
War in Heaven
The Holy Spirit: Pneumatology Questions I
The Law, Love, Faith-Rest and Messianism
Paul and the Law
Genesis Questions III
Sin and Salvation, Confession and Forgiveness
Have I Lost My Salvation? (III)
The Battlefield Within: Fighting the inner spiritual Struggle.
Putting Christ in Christmas: Loving Jesus, the Star and the Magi, Wonderful Counselor.
Old Testament Interpretation: Moses and Zipporah, David's disastrous Census, the Destruction of the Midianites, et al.
Healing, Miracles, and Dreams: Sorting the Wheat from the Chaff by biblical Means
153 Fish: Explaining some Difficult New Testament Passages
Kenosis: Our Lord's Self-Limitation during the 1st Advent
Biblical Anthropology II: 'Soul sleep', & dichotomy vs. trichotomy
Biblical Anthropology I: The Nature of Human Beings and Human Life according to the Bible.
Genesis Gap: Questions and Answers II.
Culture and Christianity VII: Jury Duty, Witnessing, Biometry, Military Service et al.
Culture and Christianity VI: Halloween, Holidays, Aliens, and Christian Applications.
Angelic Issues V: Michael, the Angel of the Lord, Christophany, demons, cherubs, and Satan's revolt.
Angelic Issues IV: Satan's Revolt in the Plan of God.
New Testament Interpretation: Melchizedek, 'Forsake not Assembly', 'Women Remain Silent', Water-Baptism, Tongues, Prophecy, Intervention of Departed Believers.
Lost my salvation II?
All about Ichthys: Mutual Encouragement in the Lord.
Fallen Angels, Demons, Nephilim, and the Devil's Methodology.
End Times Interpretation II.
Salvation, the Gospel, and Unbelief.
The Bible and the Canon: The Inspired Word of God.
End Times Interpretation.
Grace versus Law.
Communion and the Spiritual Death of Christ.
Sinlessness and 1st John.
Israelology, Anti-Semitism, the Remnant, Gentiles, Lost Tribes, Jewish Myths.
"Soul Sleep" versus our true Heavenly State.
Christology Questions III: The Angel of the Lord, the Lamb Slain, monogenes.
Angelic Issues III: Demons, Satan, Elders, Female Angels and Guardians.
Against Universalism III: Unbelievers in the Plan of God.
Waters Above, the Firmament, and the Genesis Gap.
In Need of Guidance and Encouragement.
Biblical Languages, Texts and Translations V.
Servants, Slaves, Disciples, and Ministers.
Baptism: Water and Spirit II.
Bible Interpretation III: David's Anointing, Stephen versus Genesis, Triplets, This People, and more.
Evangelism in Principle and Practice.
Scripture versus Personal Experience.
Calvinism, Covenants and Catholicism.
Culture and Christianity V: Temporal Authority vs. Biblical Application.
False Doctrine of Absolute Eternal Security III.
The Dangers of Messianic Legalism IV: Unclean and Impure?
Things to Come III: The Wrath of God and the Fate of the Beast's Army.
God Works All Things Together for Good.
The 7 Trumpets, the 7 Kings, Nephilim, Antichrist and Revived Rome.
The Coming Tribulation and the Kingdom of God.
Sin, Confession and Forgiveness.
Mutual Encouragement in Christ.
Biblical Languages, Texts and Translations IV.
Culture and Christianity IV: Doing one's job as 'unto the Lord', the peril's of 'heroic medicine', Christian perspectives on legalizing marijuana, when lying is not a sin, and when life begins.
Eschatology Issues V: "It is not for you to know the times or the seasons".
Ichthys and Contemporary Christianity.
Gospel Questions V: Help my Unbelief, Respecting our Enemies, etc.
The Two Witnesses of the Tribulation: Moses and Elijah.
The Apostles, the Jerusalem Council, and Legalism then and now.
Aspects of the Christian Walk: Gambling, Lying, Christmas, Judging, Worrying, et al.
Believers in the World: Using our Free Will to Respond to the Lord
Christology Questions II: The Serpent Lifted and the Cross, Jesus' Infallibility, Destroy this Temple, the Sign Spoken Against, His Glorification, the Spirit's Anointing, and the Necessity for His Humanity.
Paul's Jerusalem Error, Worshiping Truly, the Priesthood of the Believer, and Peter's Vision of the Impure Food
Christian Trials and Testing
Gospel Questions IV: The Prophet, the rich man in Hades, Peter's wife, the 'eleven' and the 'twelve' apostles, 'the world could not contain' (Jn.21:25), and progressive revelation.
Eschatology Issues IV: Israeli politics, 'This Generation', Signs of the Times, the Beast presently alive?, 'Flee Babylon', Preparing for the Tribulation, and 'was, is not, will be'.
John's Water-Baptism versus the Baptism of the Holy Spirit
Eschatology Issues III: Over-focusing on Revelation, the Seven Churches, Enoch versus Elijah, and the Symbolism of the Menorah
The Purpose of Chronicles, Cyrus the Persian, the Chronology of the Exodus Plagues, Qumran and Isaiah, Nebuchadnezzar's Madness, and Jeremiah 31:22, "A Woman will Embrace a Man".
Aaron and the Golden Calf, Mount Zion, Moses and Zipporah, the high priest's attire, and the ark of the covenant.
Aspects of the Genesis Curse on Animals, the Tree of Knowing Good and Evil, Jacob Wrestling with the Angel of the Lord, and Kainam.
The City of David, the Star of David, Solomon's Wisdom, and the Song of Solomon.
The Israelites at Kadesh and 'not entering the Land of Promise'.
Genesis Gap: Questions and Answers.
Sin and Spiritual Transformation.
Cults and Christianity IV
Cults and Christianity III
Cults and Christianity II
Cults and Christianity.
One Baptism: the True Meaning of Peter's Words at Acts 2:38.
Apostasy and the Sin unto Death, the Conscience and Sanctification.
The Plan of God and Individual Salvation (excerpt from BB 4B)
In Your Anger, do not Sin: Ephesians 4:26 and the Sin Nature
Bible Interpretation II: Easter, Abiathar, the Hyssop-Blood Cross, Baal, the Scarlet Thread, Names of God, Adiaphoria, and Mezentius.
Spiritual Warfare II
Culture and Christianity III
Have I Lost my Salvation?
On the Firing Line: Encouragement in Christian Trials
Eschatology and the Old Testament
Prayer and our Walk with Jesus.
Issues of Canonicity II: Aramaic, Enoch, KJV, and the Pastorals
Bible Vocabulary and Bible Word Studies
Satan, his Demons, and the Gnostics
Antichrist: Alive and Well and Living on Planet Earth?
The Nature of Angels
Our Eternal Future: Life after Death for Believers in Jesus Christ
Giants and Nephilim, Sumerian Myths, and Sea Monsters
Dreams and Visions II
The Golden Rule
The Divinity of Jesus Christ
Free-Will Faith and the Will of God
Some Sensitive Topics III
The Spirit that dwelleth in us lusteth to envy: explaining James 4:5.
Faith: What is it?
The Seven-Fold Spirit of God.
Free-Will Faith in the Plan of God.
Putting the Word of God First.
The False Doctrine of "Soul Sleep" II.
The False Doctrine of Absolute Eternal Security II.
The Plan of God
The Dangers of Messianic Legalism III
The Dangers of Messianic Legalism II
The Dangers of Messianic Legalism.
The Gift of Tongues: Part 2
The Gift of Tongues: Part 1
Mega-Churches, Emergent Christianity, Spirituality and Materialism.
Epignosis, Christian Epistemology, and Spiritual Growth.
Jephthah's Daughter, Marriage, Divorce, and Remarriage.
Christian Unity and Divisiveness.
Death, Martyrdom and Resurrection.
Blessing, Cursing, and Prayer.
Freedom and Responsibility.
Fighting the Good Fight of Faith.
Only-Begotten, Mother-of-God, On-this-Rock: English-only Interpretation is Dangerous.
The Greek Text of the New Testament and some Issues of Textual Criticism.
What does the name 'Christian' mean?
Some Jewish Issues.
Christians Beware: Internet Frauds and the Need for Spiritual Discernment (part 2).
Christians Beware: Internet Frauds and the Need for Spiritual Discernment.
Sin and Forgiveness.
Spring Special: The Millennial Regathering and Purging of Israel.
Life Begins at Birth.
Culture and Christianity II
Culture and Christianity I
The Saved and the Unsaved
Last Things and Last Judgments
The Local Church and Personal Ministry IV
The Local Church and Personal Ministry III
The Local Church and Personal Ministry II
The Local Church and Personal Ministry I
More on Antichrist and his Kingdom
Antichrist and Babylon
Some Sensitive Topics II.
Christmas Special: The Judgment and Reward of the Church.
What is God's Will?
Combating Legalism VI
Combating Legalism V
Combating Legalism IV
Combating Legalism III
Combating Legalism II
Combating Legalism I
Aspects of the False Doctrine of Institutional Security
Chronological Order of the Books of the Bible II
Biblical Languages, Texts and Translations III
Biblical Languages, Texts and Translations II
Biblical Languages, Texts and Translations I
Gospel Questions III: Least in the kingdom, Millstones, Pennies, Pebbles, Babes, Rhaka, Tallits, and the Crown of Thorns.
Gospel Questions II: Jesus' Turning Water to Wine, Sweating Blood, Walking on Water, Washing the Disciples' Feet, and the Promise of Freedom."
Things to Come II: Genesis Rapture, Daniel's Weeks, Seven Kings, Signs of the Apocalypse, Tribulational Suffering, Seven Seals, the Bride of Christ, and Mystery Babylon.
Things to Come: The Half Hour, the 144,000, the Book of Life, Rewards, the Beast's Kingdom, the Great Apostasy, and the so-called 'Partial Rapture'.
Satan and the Existence of Evil.
The Holy Spirit: Blasphemy against, Restraining Ministry, and Gender.
Spiritual Gifts and Spiritual Growth
Christian Love, the Golden Rule, Christian Military Service and Self-Defense.
Issues of Canonicity: Apocrypha, Enoch, and Inspiration.
Church: The Biblical Ideal versus the Contemporary Reality.
Numbers, Letters, and the Mark of the Beast.
Gospel Questions I: Jesus' Life, the Gospels and Cherubs, and who Wrote Matthew.
More Questions about Genesis.
Naaman, Nero, Nineveh, and Senacharib.
The False Doctrine of Absolute Eternal Security.
Choosing Hell: Questions about Salvation and the Love of God.
The Chronology of the End.
The Route of the Israelites in Crossing
the Red Sea.
Some Issues of Transmission, Translation, and Transliteration: The Camel and the Needle, etc.
Aspects of the Life of Christ: Jesus' siblings, the man born blind, et al.
Jesus is God and man.
Jesus is God.
Redemption, the Blood of Christ, Christ our Passover, and The Passion of the Christ.
Eschatology Issues II: Angelic bodies, heaven and hell, Satan and the Nephilim, etc.
The Book of Job and Biblical Interpretation.
Some Questions about Eternity.
Who Controls our Thoughts and Emotions?
The Day of the Lord.
Sleep as a Euphemism for Death.
Christ's Preaching to the Spirits in Hell (1Pet.3:18-20), & Michael's Rebuke of Satan (2Pet.2:10-11 ).
Recovering from Sin.
The Timing of the Resurrection.
Dispensations, the Church, the Rapture, and the Destruction of the Universe.
Christianity versus Contemporary Kitsch.
Purpose Driven Life, Oprah's New Age Religion, et al.
Lot, Esau, and Cain: Learning through
Against Universalism II: Only Believers are Saved.
Against Universalism I: Free Will and the Image of God.
Courage in the Fight.
The Seven Edens and the Eden of Adam and Eve.
Opposition to the Genesis Gap from the Creation Research Institute et al.
Mary 'Full of Grace'?
Changing the Name of God?
The Beast: Some Questions about Antichrist.
The Book of Revelation: Some Questions.
Red Hot or Lukewarm? Bible Teaching versus Sermonizing.
The Last Judgment and the Great White Throne.
Baptism: Water and Spirit.
Christology: Some Questions on the Life of Christ.
Train up a Child in the Way he should Go.
War, History, and Politics.
Unbelief and its Consequences.
Dreams and Visions.
Explaining and Defending the Trinity and the Person of Christ.
Free Will and Faith under Pressure.
Angelic Issues II.
Science and the Bible.
Bible Interpretation I: Academics, Versions et al.
Faith in the Word of God: the Basis of all True Worship.
Aspects of the Resurrection II.
Faith and Encouragement in the midst of Fiery Trials.
Some Sensitive Topics.
Jethro, Amenhotep, Iraq, the Catacombs, and the KJV.
Eschatology Issues: The Fig Tree, Ezekiel 38, Joel 3, and the Trumpets.
Christ the Rock, the Rooster's Crow, and the Cross.
Applying Faith II: Production, Forgiveness, Circumcision, Truth over People.
Applying Faith: Eating, Drinking, and Vacation.
The Tree of Life, Communion, and the Virgin Birth.
Can Prayer Be Offered From Heaven? & Some Genesis Questions.
Walking the Path of Faith through the Light of the Word of God.
Salvation on the battlefield, truth revealed to infants, and damnation.
Divine Sovereignty and Divine Judgment.
God's Free Gift of Salvation.
Should Christians wear Jewelry?
The Lord's Prayer.
The Events Surrounding the Birth of Christ.
Cremation or Burial?
Demon Possession, Marriage,
and Bible Prophecy.
No Grounds for Divorce?
The Shape of the Universe, Hominids, and the Genesis Gap.
Taking Personal Responsibility: Interest, Bankruptcy, Gambling, and Employment.
The Seven Churches, the Judgment Seat of Christ, and other issues in Eschatology.
The Canonicity of the book of Hebrews.
Great White Throne, the Last Judgment, and the Outer Darkness.
Political Action versus Biblical Christianity.
Study Tools and Methodologies.
The Gospel and the Kingdom of God.
Pursuing a Deeper Relationship with Jesus and Christian Epistemology.
The Origin and the Danger of the Pre-Tribulational Rapture Theory.
The Divinity of the Spirit and the Percentage of those who are Saved.
Should Christians ever consider getting a lawyer?
Pastoral Authority, Popes, Pat Robertson, and Pelagianism.
Some Questions on Church Polity.
Apostles and Evangelism
Luther, Arminius, Calvin, Kant, Ironside, Tutu and Thieme.
Transmutation, Resuscitation, and Resurrection.
Is the Soul a tertium quid?
More on the Documentary Hypothesis and More on the Rapture.
Enoch's Walk with God and Some Questions in the Gospels.
The Influence of the Renaissance and Rationalism on the Church and Cutting off Arms in Malachi 2:3.
1st John 5:20 & Romans 6:23.
Baptism and Following Jesus.
Where is Armageddon?
Assurance of Salvation.
The Cross, Sin, and the Devil in God's Plan.
More on: Spiritual Gifts; Hats & Hair; the Age of Accountability.
Daniel 9:25 and Daniel 11:30.
Who will populate earth during the Millennium? and Asking for Wisdom: James 1:5.
Was Judas Saved?, The Gospel of Judas, and Issues of Canonicity.
Is 'My Son' Israel or Jesus in Hosea 11:1? & How do you Prove Sin to Someone?
Did Matthew Write his Gospel in Hebrew?
Christian Crowns, Pagan Names, and the Time of the Cock-Crow.
Child-like Faith, Mark vs. Matthew, the Mahdi, and 'Who was with God in the Beginning?
True Orthodoxy and False Creeds.
Foot-washing, Bitter Herbs, Baptism, and Borrowed Faith.
All Things Charismatic.
Friday versus Thursday Crucifixion.
Jesus' Cursing of the Fig Tree, Apostasy, and 'Feng Shui'.
The Genesis Serpent, Using "it" to refer to the baby Jesus, and more on Tattoos.
Resisting the Devil.
Why did Jesus choose John over James to take care of His mother Mary?
Antichrist's 'desire of women' in Daniel 11:37 et al.
Do recent catastrophes have a divine origin?
Does God really want us to be sick and poor? Revisiting the prosperity gospel.
Why did our Lord Jesus arise from the tribe of Judah?
What will our relationship be in heaven with children who died young?
The baptism of the Holy Spirit as distinct from speaking in tongues.
The Grammar behind the Genesis Gap.
The Great White Throne Judgment.
Moses and Zipporah.
The Victory of Faith.
Does God's choice of us eliminate our free will?
Why does God allow bad things to happen?
The Bible as "divine", roof prayer, and tattoos.
Character in Hebrews 1:3, et al.
Exorcism, et al.
"Are the children of unbelievers lost if they die before receiving Christ?"
How not to get "left behind".
"Is baptism necessary for salvation?"
"The nature of life after death."
"The personality of the Holy Spirit."
"The dragon of Revelation 12 and the talking idol of Revelation 13."
"Bound by Satan in Luke 13:16, language and the Tower of Babel, Daniel's 70th week, and the number 12."
"Infirmities and Diseases in Matthew 8:17"
"The Leftover Baskets of Bread and Fish in John 6."
"Waiting for the Ascension" and "Amos 4:11".
Why was Canaan cursed?
Should Christians have a competitive attitude?
John "leapt for joy" in the womb - or did he?
Satanic Influence in Video Games and Television.
Moving Mountains: Matthew 21:21
Not a hair shall be lost? Luke 21:16 versus Luke 21:18.
The reign of antichrist: 7 years or 3 and 1/2 years?
The Trinity in Scripture.
The Ark of the Covenant.
"Doubts about the Nephilim in Genesis 6" and "Ezekiel 9:4 and the Mark of the Beast"
"Word Counts in the Bible", "Him whom they Pierced (Rev.1:7)", and "Necromancy".
"Waiting for a Savior" and "The Direction East in the Bible"
Is there a purgatory according to the Bible?
Your desire shall be for your husband: Genesis 3:16.
Have I committed the unforgivable sin?
Is the local church meant to be a patriarchy?
Why doesn't the Bible mention all of the prophets of the children of Israel?
The True "Victorious Life".
Tohu in Genesis 1:2 and the Cause of the Darkness.
Why Doesn't God Prevent All Children from Dying?
Why were Christians being regarded as "evil-doers" in 1st Peter 2:12?
The Scofield Reference Bible.
Phylacteries and the Mark of the Beast, and "What about Joseph?"
Feeling desperate and alone.
Is Tithing net or gross?
Assembly of the local church, and Jesus' use of "I AM" from Exodus 3:14 in John 8:58
The "burden of the Lord" in Jeremiah 23:32-40, and judgment for idle words in Matthew 12:36-37.
The importance of spiritual resiliency.
Does God use disease to discipline us?
Recovering from Cult Exposure.
Variability in Christian Testing and Personal Tribulation.
Is there any value to the Apocrypha?
The Communion Ceremony outside of the local church.
The Christian Walk, the End, and Tattoos.
Should Christians honor Sunday as the new Sabbath?
Chronological order of the books of the Bible.
Doubt, light, missed opportunities et al.
Addicted to Sin.
Corporate prayer in Matthew 18:19: "when two agree on earth".
What does the Bible say about humor?
The value of cumulative prayer.
Our Heavenly, Pre-Resurrection, Interim State.
How could a loving God order the destruction of the Canaanites?
Should Christians observe the Torah?
Church Polity and three other passages.
Walking with Jesus.
Tongues: does 'no man' understand?
The few saved, the door in heaven, visions of heavenly realities, and Christmas.
Christian suffering and spiritual maturity.
Aliens, antichrist, and eschatology.
Does exceptionally sinful behavior indicate that a Christian has lost salvation?
Should Christians celebrate Jewish festivals?
The Deaths of the 12 Disciples / Apostles of Christ.
Categories of Sin in Psalm 19.
Some brief answers on a variety of topics.
Pastoral Support, Pastoral Preparation, and the Purpose of Assembly.
Encouragement, Isaiah 6:11-13, and the Hope of Repentance.
Questioning the Genesis Gap.
Dinosaurs, the Nephilim, Noah, et al.
How much should we pay our pastor?
More about Women Preachers.
Is it wrong for me to celebrate Easter?
The Remnant in Isaiah 6:13.
The Big Distinction.
The Day of the Lord in 2nd Peter 3:10.
The Day of the Lord.
The Sealing of the Holy Spirit.
Visions of Angels: Colossians 2:18.
Waiting on God's timing: patience in testing.
"Your Throne, O God": Psalm 45:6.
Moses striking the Rock.
Procreation and Creation.
What is meant by the phrase "the Lord's footstool"?
1st Peter 3:3-5
A conversation about divorce and remarriage.
Faith in the midst of the fiery trial.
Hebrews 10:26 again, and two other notes on Arthur Pink and the Greek word diakonos.
What is the correct translation of Isaiah 59:19?
Is the star of Acts 7:43 the star of David?
Some questions about Nimrod and Christmas trees, Tongues, and Healing
Is Jesus the only One ever to restore sight?
What happens to people who were born and died prior to the birth of Christ?
Which is better, the King James Version or the New King James Version?
What is the minimum necessary to be saved?
How can we know whose interpretation of the Bible is right (Part 2)?
How can we know whose interpretation of the Bible is right (Part 1)?
Psalm 22:1, "My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?"
The "Mind of Christ" in 1st Corinthians 2:16
Simeon and Simon, and the two crows of the rooster
Ichthys, saints, and the Last Adam
Does Hebrews 10:26 teach loss of salvation?
Eternal security: where does one draw the line?
Who are Gog and Magog in Ezekiel 38-39?
How did John the baptist come to doubt Jesus?
Is Jesus literally seated on the throne at God's right hand?
Are the Celts the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel?
Whatever happened to the "Genesis Gap"?
"The baptism which now saves you": 1st Peter 3:21.
Hebrew Language Study Tools.
What type of healing is being discussed in Isaiah 53:5?
The Origin of the Four Seasons
2nd Peter 3:5: Doubting the Tribulation
Tent-making and Galatians 6:6
A Question about Ichthys books
Biblical Metaphors and Symbolism
Faith and the Pre-Tribulational "Rapture".
Bible translation and John 8:58.
Melchizedek and the high priesthood of Christ: two questions et alia.
In need of encouragement.
The centurion and the Syro-Phoenician woman.
Who is the Meshiach?
A Sadducean Question
What is "heaven" like according to Christian teachings?
Acts 20:28: Whose Blood?
1st Corinthians 11: Hats or Hair?
Confession of Sin, Fellowship, and the Filling of the Holy Spirit.
A Miscellany of Questions and Answers (Nineveh, the beast, tongues, demons, Sadam, etc.)
Some Greek Questions in the Gospels (John 1:3; 2:19; 8:58; Luke 23:43)
Is Man trichotomous, and does that mean that salvation is three-tiered?
Questioning the Trinity
The blood of Christ
Christ knocking at the door in Revelation 3:20
The futility of memory without God and eternal life.
The meaning of Jesus' words, "I am" in John 8:58
What does the Bible say about Heaven and Hell?
Peace in 1st Corinthians 14:33
Salvation and Church Affiliation.
Several questions on the book of Hebrews.
Does the Bible prohibit women from preaching or teaching in the Church?
Should Christian leaders refrain from drinking in public?
How to use the Bible translations at Ichthys.
The Worship of Jesus: a proof of His divinity?
An Extended Conversation about the Baptism of the Holy Spirit.
Is water baptism required for Christians today?
Are health and wealth a part of the gospel?
Will those in Hades be able to see Christ's return?
Feelings of Guilt about Remarriage.
Who are the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel?
What does "the Word was with God" mean in John 1:1-2?
Three questions on three verses in Isaiah (Is.21:4; 28:10, & 66:24).
How important is education for a pastor?
Does Hebrews 10:26-35 ("deliberate sinning" etc.) mean that a believer can lose his or her salvation?
Availability and use of Ichthys materials: several questions.
Is there any difference between demons and fallen angels?
Two questions about Judas Iscariot.
Three Questions about Tattoos and Salvation.
The Hebrew word for 'one' (`echadh) and the uniqueness of God.
Did the witch of Endor really conjure up the spirit of Samuel?
A Question about the "Waters Above".
Why did God the Father wait so long to send Jesus into the world?
How does being "slain in the Spirit" relate to being baptized in the Spirit?
How do you prove the existence of God?
Where does the Bible teach that Jesus is God?
Is it ever Justifiable to Tell a Lie (part 2)?
Seeing double in Matthew.
Mary, Joseph, and Nazareth.
Is the Westminster Catechism a Good Reference Tool?
What does it mean "the spirit returns to God" in Ecclesiastes 12:7?
Is there any Connection between biblical Gemstones and Moral Characteristics?
Are Miraculous Gifts Operational Today?
Jesus Christ in the Old Testament (Christophany: Gen.3:8).
Can those in organizations which teach "salvation by works" be saved?
Is "helpmeet" a wrong translation in Genesis 2:20?
Our will and God's WILL.
Cast thy Bread upon the Waters: What do the seven and eight portions in Ecclesiastes 11:2 mean?
Was Cain Satan's literal "seed"?
The Demon Possessed Girl in Acts 16:16.
The "Sin unto Death" in 1st John 5:16.
Is death just a natural part of human life?
Communion and the Blood of Christ.
What does it mean in 1st Corinthians 7:14, "the unbelieving husband is sanctified"?
The Re-institution of the Feast of Tabernacles in the Millennium.
Secular Documentation for the Exodus.
The false doctrine of "soul sleep".
The Author of Hebrews and Jesus' Perfect Completion of His Mission.
The Trinity in Isaiah 63:10-15.
How old was Jesus at the time of His crucifixion and resurrection?
Five Smooth Stones: 1st Samuel 17:40
How can we know the Bible is true?
The name "Jesus".
Habakkuk's Prosperity Prayer: Habakkuk 3:17-19.
Jeremiah 31:22: "A Woman shall Compass a Man".
The New International Version of the Bible and some issues in Bible translation.
Is "the Prophet" of Deuteronomy 18:18 Muhammad?
The One True God and the Trinity in the Old Testament.
Are those in Hebrews 6:4 who "crucify the Son of God afresh" lost?
Are New Bible Translations Part of a Conspiracy?
What exactly is the "red heifer prophecy", and how does it relate to the events of the end times?
Where did the waters of Genesis 1 go?
Sin, Baptism, and the Book of
Tithing and the Book of Life
The Dangers of the Prosperity Gospel.
English and the Tower of Babel.
The "Seven Thunders" of Revelation 10:3-4
The fate of the unrighteous dead in Isaiah 66:24
Who are the "sons of the kingdom" in Matthew 18:11-12?
Why does Judah get greater honor than Jerusalem in Zechariah 12:7?
Are there Female Angels?
Longevity in the Millennium.
How is the date of Easter computed?
What is the meaning of the 1290 days versus the 1335 days in Daniel 12?
What Church era are we now in?
The mark of the beast.
Christophany in the Exodus.
Can you explain "help my unbelief!" in Mark 9:24?
What does it mean to "overcome" in Revelation chapters 2 and 3?
Are women required to wear veils or hats in
Is the world about to come to an end?
Does the Bible ever describe the earth as being round?
Pre-, mid-, or post-Tribulation rapture?
Pearls before swine.
Recognizing the Messiah.
The gift of healing.
The origin and fate of the "giants" in Genesis chapter six.
Christian suffering - Christian encouragement.
Is speaking in tongues biblical?
Is speaking in tongues a sin?
Can you recommend a good commentary on the book of Romans?
Aspects of the resurrection.
The recipients of Peter's epistles.
Pre- or Post-Tribulation "rapture"?
The lives of the prophets.
The old prophet who lied.
Animal sacrifice in the millennium.
Is it ever justifiable to lie?
wrote the King James version?
The meaning of the divine name יהוה.
The so-called "documentary hypothesis".
The relationship between the books of Kings and Chronicles.
David's disastrous census of Israel.
Aspects of the Unseen Angelic Warfare and 666, the Mark of the Beast.
The 200 million strong demon army of Revelation 9:13.
Deliverance through Childbearing in 1st Timothy 2:15?
Some questions about the Tribulation.
More on divorce and remarriage.
Divorce and remarriage.
The antecedents of ICHTHYS.
What does it mean to "remember the Sabbath and keep it holy"?
The manner of the apostle Peter's death.
Wasn't Matthias the thirteenth apostle?
Forward progress necessary for salvation and spiritual growth.
The "seven days" of human history.
1st John 1:9 and confessing sin.
ICHTHYS and the role of traditional Christianity.
Can you recommend a good survey for the Old and New Testaments?
Where can I find more information on the "Genesis gap"?
Is Church membership an issue in salvation?
Can you recommend a church?
Are these materials available for purchase as books?
A bit of autobiography.
What is your opinion of the Abingdon one-volume Bible Commentary?
What is the significance of the number "20" in the Bible?
The 144,000 of Revelation chapters 7 and 14.
What is your view on predestination?
Who is "true Israel"?
The chronology of the date 2026.
Does baptism play a role in being born again?
Why does the devil have access to God while man cannot stand in His presence?
The structure of the book of Revelation.
What is your view of the rapture?
What is meant by the "10 days" of Revelation
Dragons in the Bible?
Are there apostles in the Church today?
What is the meaning of the word "chosen" in the Bible.
What are the most common Bible names?
What is the biblical significance of the number forty?
What does the Bible have to say about witchcraft?
How can I protect myself from false teaching?
Didn't the devil know he couldn't defeat God?
Are the Masons wrong according to the Bible?
Can the faith of "backsliders" be restored?
Are there biblical origins to mythology?
What does the phrase "sides of the pit" mean in Isaiah 14:15?
Can prayer be offered in the name of the Son?
Election and John 6:37?
Is it valid to celebrate Christmas?
Can you give me some information on divine names in the Bible?
What is the significance of name changes in the Bible?
Is faith a "gift of God"?
Is there a "gospel of Thomas"?
Is the nature of Man dichotomous or trichotomous?
Will the temple be rebuilt in Jerusalem?
Does the Bible teach a literal Millennium?
What does the word "good" mean in Genesis?
Who are "the dead" who "rise first" in 1st Thessalonians 4?
Are the Greek tenses in John 7:34 correctly translated?
Is the devil "mad" to oppose God?
Does the Bible require supporting
How can Jesus be a man and God at the same time?
How did people atone for intentional sin in Old Testament times?
What is the symbolism of the Lamb of God in Revelation?
Can you recommend some word study tools for Bible study?
Can people who commit suicide be saved?
Are tattoos biblical?
Is it "ichthys" or "ichthus"?
What is the difference between wisdom and discernment?
Marriage of Believers and Unbelievers.
Is hearing believing in John 6:35?
How certain a date is 2026?
Is Paul describing himself in Romans chapter seven?
Is tithing required for salvation?
What is the evidence for the "rapture"?
Is there any validity to the "prosperity gospel"?
Who are the "Nephilim" in Genesis chapter six?
Is there a literal "devil"?
What does the Bible have to say about reincarnation?
What is the unpardonable sin?
Believing the Bible for Spiritual Growth.
Why was the New Testament written in Greek?
What about those who have never heard of Christ?
What about elders and deacons?
Eternal Security and "sinless perfection".
Eternal Security and "salvation by works".
Does the Bible teach ex nihilo
When did Jesus first know He was God's Son?
Are there prophets today?
Despairing of life.
How important is baptism?
How could Christ have been three days and
Do Muslims worship the One true God?
What can I do about spiritual fainting?